Child Discipline Imitative Condensed Overview and Technical Summary
By Nialos Leaning
[email protected]
Copyright 2014 by Nialos Leaning, all rights reserved.
Permission for noncommercial free (no charge) electronic distribution and
personal use reproduction of this fictional article is hereby granted. All such
distribution, re-posting and reproduction must be without alteration of this
article in any way, must include this entire copyright notice, and must in
their entireties retain the following statements:
This fictional article is intended for ADULTS ONLY. It presents a not so brief
overview and technical summary of the fictional Child Discipline Initiative
story universe created by Nialos Leaning. The Initiative involves preteen and
teen boys and girls being disciplined with public nudity, sexual humiliation,
and spanking. If you are not of a legal age in your locality to view such
material, or if such material does not appeal to you, do not read further, and
do not save this fictional article.
The content of this fictional article is pure fantasy, written for the
enjoyment of adults. Behavior described may in real life be illegal or
considered by society to be abusive, harmful, unacceptable or undesirable. The
author does not advocate, condone nor personally engage in any such behavior.
This document, as is all fiction, is fantasy and not reality. The author does
recognize the difference between the two. Please do understand that some of us,
including the author, enjoy such fantasy material.
Compliments and constructive criticism are always welcome.
* * * * *
This document serves as an introduction to the Child Discipline Initiative
story universe, primarily for authors interested in writing stories set in that
universe and other interested readers. Authors who wish to write stories
in this universe are most welcome to do so provided their stories acknowledge
they are set in the Child Discipline Initiative story universe created by
Nialos Leaning and substantially adhere to the principles, policies,
philosophies, procedures, practices and organizational and operational
structure presented in Santa Strikes Back Again and this Child
Discipline Imitative Condensed Overview and Technical Summary. These
stories do not need to make mention of Santa, the North Pole, or Santa's Spank
Shops; they may be in any locale and setting the story author desires.
* * * * *
Child Discipline Imitative Condensed Overview and Technical Summary
By Nialos Leaning
Note: The following material is written primarily from the perspective of
how the fictional Child Discipline Initiative operates in the United States;
other countries may vary somewhat in specific details based on local customs,
traditions, and disciplinary priorities.
As used in this article, it is important to understand the difference in
meaning between inappropriate behavior, delinquent acts, and status
offenses. Inappropriate behavior consists of acts that most adults would
consider as either being misbehavior or detrimental to the child's welfare and
best interests. A delinquent act is any behavior prohibited by law that would
be considered a crime if committed by an adult, i.e., either a felony,
misdemeanor or in some states for relatively minor offenses a criminal
infraction. Status offense are violations of laws prohibiting children
but not adults form certain behaviors, such as being in public after a
municipal youth curfew, underage tobacco use, underage alcohol use, and if all
other efforts to resolve the issue have failed, persistent truancy. The Child
Discipline Initiative processes and treats delinquent acts involving
infractions the same as it does status offenses.
The modern worldwide Child Disciple Initiative (CDI) that is now the
standard among all developed and many other nations was adapted as the most
viable response to widespread concern over the multi-decade long trend of
ever increasing levels of inappropriate behavior by children, especially those
ages 10 to 17.
Implementation involved a 5 year period from initial research to operation of
fully functional Child Discipline Assistance Centers. The first step in
the implementation was the conducting of research and studies to identify the
most effective methods to decrease the levels of misbehavior and to hold
children accountable for their actions.
Within the first year, the research reached an at the time controversial
conclusion that the most effective methodology for holding children accountable
involved imposing consequences for inappropriate behavior that utilized a
combination of humiliation, embarrassment and pain, the so called HEP model.
Shortly after the first year, the even more controversial consensus developed
among the researchers that the best results were achieved through using sexual
behaviors such as forced erections and public masturbation for humiliation,
public nudity for embarrassment, and public spankings for pain. Based on these
findings, policies and techniques were designed and protocols involving
counseling, education, and shaping public perceptions were developed to
minimize any potential long term and short term harmful outcomes, other than
embarrassment and humiliation during the duration of time and for a short period
after a child is under HEP discipline.
During that first year, it was also unequivocally established as had been long
thought for many centuries that all child misbehavior stemmed from a lapse of
self discipline on the child's part. That line of study also clearly verified
the long held supposition that a child's repeated failure to do what is
expected and required by society, community, family and school or not doing
what is necessary to succeed at personal goals such as athletic, artistic or
academic excellence was due to a persistent lack of self discipline by the
child. It was quickly established that the same HEP methods utilized for
holding children accountable for and correcting inappropriate behavior were
very effective in also alleviating an endemic lack of self discipline and
surprisingly, a pervasive lack of self confidence.
For those children with a persistent lack of self discipline, the HEP
methodologies develop self discipline through the mechanism of requiring the
child to repeatedly do things he or she finds difficult, embarrassing,
humiliating or painful until reaching the point of doing those actions without
protest, hesitation or reluctance even if the child is uncomfortable doing
them. For self confidence, the underlying psychological process is much the
same; the child develops self confidence by being required to repeatedly risk
doing inherently unpleasant humiliating, embarrassing and painful tasks until
mastering doing them on demand without any trepidation or delay even if the tasks
remain unpleasant for the child to do. (It has long been known that
children primarily develop self confidence by taking risks doing actions they
deem dangerous, beyond their abilities, or unpleasant until they achieve some
degree of success at performing those tasks.)
With the above findings widely endorsed by the experts, implementation next
moved on to development of a comprehensive integrated system intended to
address both types of disciplinary failure on the child's part. From that
emerged the philosophy that the primary purpose of the system was to assist
those responsible for a child's upbringing and well being, such as parents and
schools, in developing the child's self discipline to at least the level
necessary for success in all aspects of life. From this philosophy
emerged the methodologies now in use of correcting temporary lapses of
discipline as evidenced by misbehavior and inappropriate actions by imposing
short term Child Consequence Orders and alleviating persistent demonstrations
of a lack of self discipline or lack of self confidence by using longer term
Child Discipline Orders.
Next attention was given to organizational structure. A widely supported
determination was made that services and consequences were best delivered at
open to the public Child Discipline Assistance Centers. These CDACs, as they
came to be known, serve children ages 5 to 17 and in countries such as the
United States and Canada which now considered than to be children, those 18, 19
and 20 year olds who had not yet graduated high school (or its equivalent in
their country) or received a Certificate of High School Equivalency or similar
credential. Those 18, 19 and 20 year olds who have graduated or received
a certificate are considered adults and are not subject to the
Initiative. (In the United States, high school graduation signifies
completion of a 13 year long course of study that begins with kindergarten,
usually at age 5, and ends at the conclusion of grade 12, typically at age 17
or 18 depending on the child's actual birth date within the year. Children who
repeat one or more grade levels will be at an older age upon graduation and
remain children until graduation or reaching age 21. Conversely, those
who skip grade levels will be a younger age at graduation but are still
children until reaching age 18.)
As part of the implementation, a comprehensive media campaign was implemented
to garner public support for the initiative, educate about specific
disciplinary consequences, accustom the population to publically viewing
consequences, and generating widespread public acceptance of nudity, sexual
humiliation, and spanking as being the accepted appropriate response to
childhood inappropriate behaviors and failures of self discipline and self
confidence. This campaign featured two major components. The first
was an (still ongoing) effort producing educational materials in print, video
and film describing the Initiative and its philosophy, procedures, operations
and in explicit detail the various consequences for disciplinary failure.
The other component involved uncensored depictions of consequences in fictional
books and stories, television programs, motion pictures, and live theatrical
productions. The television, film and theatre campaign utilized a graduated
approach starting with nudity in children's cartoons to eventually depicting
all possible consequences in all media and types of productions.
To avoid overly saturating the public and lessening the impact, the CDI
authorities paid producers incentives to include these depictions subject to
limitations per production or episode as to frequency, length, and types of
consequences. These incentives were important to producers as by
agreement with the various performers' unions those child performers undergoing
on screen or stage the various consequences receive for each day they perform
such consequences supplementary additional income of between 50% and 300% of
their daily contractual compensation based on type of consequences and length
of filming of the consequence. (A child who is nude on set for 1 hour receives
less than a child who is nude for 2 hours; a child who masturbates in front of
the camera receives more than a child who for the same length of time is simply
nude and spanked.) Now that the Initiative is a part of everyday life and
incentives rarely offered, authors and producers continue when appropriate to
the storyline and scenario to include such depictions as they have proven to
increase sales and attendance.
The overall administrative and operational structure that emerged was CDACs
being operated at a local level with various regional, state and national or
multinational agencies providing administrative and regulatory oversight. In
the United States, the top level agency is the United States Child Discipline
Assistance and Enforcement Administration. An example of a multinational top
level agency is the Commonwealth Nations and Crown Dependencies Child
Discipline Assistance and Enforcement Commission. Most Commonwealth
nations and all British Crown Dependencies operate under jurisdiction of the
Commission. Australia and New Zealand opted out of Commission
jurisdiction to operate their own joint agency; Canada also operates its own
agency with policies and procedures closely aligned with that of the United
States.
The lower level agency structure of the United States is typical of that in
many other jurisdictions. In the United States, each state and territory
receiving federal child discipline funding, which currently is all of them, operate
a state level administrative agency responsible for receiving and distributing
federal funding, ensuring compliance with national and state standards, and
providing support to the state's regional and local operational agencies, if
any. In some states and most territories, especially the geographically smaller
ones, the state administrative agency also operate the CDACs. In others,
especially larger ones, multi-jurisdictional regional agencies under
supervision of the state agency perform many of the same duties as the
statewide agency. In some states and larger territories, the regional agency
also operates the discipline centers. In others, these regional agencies
are purely administrative and supervisory with the centers operated by a local
agency; typically these local agencies operate within the same boundaries as
the judicial district in which they're located.
It was realized that to be highly utilized, CDACs needed to be convenient to
the public. Depending on population density, each CDAC serves an overall
population of 25,000 to 100,000 people. In the United States, children
ages 8 to 17 make up approximately 15% of the overall population and
individuals ages 5 to 19 constitutes approximately 22.5% of the
population. The goal was set that in lightly populated rural areas,
households be within one hour travel time of a CDAC, in less dense suburban
areas 45 minutes, in more heavily populated suburbs, 30 minutes, and in dense
urban areas and high density towns and communities, 20 minutes. In less
populated areas, to achieve these goals, CDACs might operate on a part time
basis, with different ones in the area open on different days or times, with
all open on weekends. This means that a parent or school might need to
wait a day or possibly two for their nearest center to be open; however,
as everywhere in the country, they are free to bring the child to any
open CDAC, not just the nearest. Some less populated communities are
experimenting with spankmobiles, which on a set schedule transport to a
neighborhood all needed equipment to set up a temporary CDAC in a local
theatre, community center, or school gymnasium or auditorium; the concept is
similar to bookmobiles operated by libraries. Spankmobiles are also
being used in some areas to set up temporary CDACs at events that attract many
children, such as major professional sporting events, youth tournaments,
carnivals, fairs, and festivals. All Child Discipline Assistance Centers
have weekend hours as well as evening hours at least to 9:00 p.m., later in
more populated areas and often on Friday and Saturday nights.
At the Child Discipline Assistance Center, various personnel perform specific
duties:
Child Discipline Assessment Officers are responsible for issuing Child
Consequence Orders after classifying behavior as to type and severity level;
consequences are based on established protocols and policies. To ensure
uniformity, assessments are computer guided and consequences computer
generated; supervisor approval is required to override computer determined
assessments and consequences. They also refer appropriate cases to the Child
Discipline Commissioners, either in lieu of or in addition to issuing a Child
Consequence Order, depending on circumstances.
Child Discipline Consequence Officers carry out the imposed
consequences. Typically, one officer reiterates the consequences to the
child and overseas the child getting ready, including becoming nude if not
already so. Two officers, including the first one, than ensure that all consequences
to be delivered or served at the CDAC are carried out completely.
Child Discipline Enforcement Officers essentially are the unarmed police
force of the Child Discipline Initiative. In the United States, depending
on the state or territory, they may be employees of the local agency operating
CDACs within its jurisdictional boundary, a regional agency, or the state
agency. The officers provide security at CDACS, patrol neighborhoods looking
for misbehaviors under CDAC jurisdiction and for noncompliance with consequence
or discipline orders. They also conduct spot checks of the homes and
schools of children under an order, especially discipline orders and level 5 or
higher consequence orders. Enforcement officers are also stationed at
most schools; they're also assigned to events attracting a large number of
children. They respond to parental and school requests for assistance; usually
these involve out of control children or children not cooperating with efforts
to take them to a CDAC. Police can also respond to such requests, if they're
closer to the scene or an enforcement officer is unavailable or is in need of
assistance. To distinguish from police vehicles, Enforcement Officers use
vehicles with flashing green and orange emergency lights rather than law
enforcement red and blue lights.
Child Disciple Evaluation Workers are the "social workers" of
the system. Upon referral of a child to a Discipline Commissioner, they
evaluate the child and family and make recommendations to the
Commissioner. By law, for children under a consequence order, the
evaluations, recommendations, and Commissioner's hearing must be completed
within 72 hours of referral or expiration of the order, whichever occurs
first. As these children are under a consequence order, they receive
their evaluations and attend hearings naked. For children not under a
consequence order, 7 days (168 hours) is permitted from referral to
hearing. Since children not under a consequence order primarily have been
referred either for mitigating or questionable circumstances that indicate a
strong possibly that a consequence order should not be issued or for a
persistent lack of self discipline or self confidence, this longer period
allows additional time to complete the more complex evaluations and family
social history investigations that these cases typically ensue. As they are not
under a consequence order, these children are dressed for their evaluations and
hearings; they only become naked upon issuance of a discipline order.
Child Discipline Commissioners function very similarly to judges, but
much more informally and without authority to impose fines or periods of
incarceration. In the United States, Commissioners are always state
employees separate from the state administrative agency to ensure impartiality
and independence in decisions. Commissioners handle cases involving a
persistent lack of self discipline as opposed to a lapse of discipline, as
those distinctions are defined above, and cases of pervasive lack of self
confidence. They handle all instances of violations of court orders not
related to felony delinquent acts, violations of consequence orders, and
violations of discipline orders. In the United States, after the
appropriate consequence order was been issued and effected, they also handle
all cases involving bullying, status offenses as previously defined in this
document, and all cases of delinquent misdemeanor and infraction offenses. They
also handle persistent runaways not complying with their treatment,
reconciliation or placement plans. By law, all these cases must be
handled by a Commissioner rather than the judicial system. Commissioners
in the United States also handle felony delinquent cases diverted by judicial
officials at any stage of the process to CDAC jurisdiction in lieu of further
court proceedings. Decisions of Commissioners can be appealed to the
courts; they can only be overturned if clearly contrary to the child discipline
laws or plainly not supported by the facts. Due to these restrictions,
very few cases are appealed and those are very rarely reversed or remanded for
further proceedings; annually in the United States less than 10 cases per year
nationwide are reversed or remanded.
The heart of the Initiative is the assignment of discipline severity levels
based on the type of inappropriate behavior:
0 - Considering child's physical age, no misbehavior or disciplinary action not
warranted; includes violation of a legislative or parent imposed curfew by 10
or less minutes if no other curfew violations in past month. Consequences and
referrals to a Commissioner are never imposed for this level. If deemed
appropriate, complaining party can be issued mandatory referrals to parenting
and child behavior classes, seminars and workshops.
1- Misbehavior so minor that it is better handled by means such as warning,
reprimand, brief time out, 24 hour or less grounding, or loss of a privilege
for no more than 1 day. Consequences and, rarely, referrals to a
Commissioner are only imposed for this level if was a downgrade from a higher
level for mitigating or age reasons. As with level 0, if deemed appropriate,
complaining party can be issued mandatory referrals to parenting and child
behavior classes, seminars and workshops.
2 - Misbehavior not classifiable at a higher or lower level; violation of a
legislative or parent imposed curfew by 11 to 30 minutes if no other curfew
violations in past 2 months. Consequences and, rarely, referrals to a
Commissioner are only imposed for this level if was for mitigating or age reasons
a downgrade from a higher level or there's a history of 2 or more level 2 or
higher misbehaviors in the past 30 days or 3 or more in the past 60 days. If
deemed appropriate, complaining party can be issued mandatory referrals to
parenting and child behavior classes, seminars and workshops.
3 - Typical normal misbehaviors such as disregard of rules, failure to timely
do chores or homework; violation of a legislative or parent imposed curfew by
31 to 60 minutes if no other curfew violations occurred in past 3 months.
4 - Disrespect, defiance, behavior dangerous to self or others other than
bullying of any kind; misdemeanors not involving either weapons, serious injury
to others, assault or battery. Also includes violations of a legislative
or parent imposed curfew not qualifying for level 2 or 3; if a repeat offense,
these curfew violations are considered disrespect and defiance and incur the
additional penalties for those behaviors. (Note: use of a firearm in commission
of a delinquent act or the use of another weapon that results in injury to any
person is a felony. Possession or display of weapons without using in a
delinquent act is generally a misdemeanor except for in some but not all cases,
firearms; consult individual state laws for clarification.)
5 - Bullying without violence, victim injury or victim emotional harm; truancy;
misdemeanor delinquent acts involving weapons, assault or battery.
6 - Bullying with any combination of violence, victim injury or victim
emotional harm; felony delinquent acts not involving weapons, injury to others,
assault or battery; misdemeanor delinquent acts causing serious injury to
others.
7 - Felony delinquent acts involving weapons other than firearms, assault or
battery.
8 - Felony delinquent acts involving injury to others other than acts involving
a firearm.
9 - Used for upgrade of severity level due to aggravating circumstances.
10 - Felony delinquent acts involving firearms without injury to others.
11 - Used for upgrade of severity level due to aggravating circumstances.
12 - Felony delinquent acts involving firearms with injury to others; injury
does not have to be caused by firearm.
13, 14 & 15 - Used for upgrade of severity level due to aggravating
circumstances.
Age related mitigating circumstances: for physical ages 5 to 7 reduce severity
levels 2 to 5 by 1; reduce levels 6 and higher to level 5. For ages 8 to
12, reduce severity levels 7 to 9 by 1 and levels 10 to 12 by 2. For ages
13 and 14 reduce severity levels 10 to 12 by 1.
Other mitigating circumstances: except for delinquent acts, in previous 3
months no level 3 or lower misbehaviors (before downgrade) or only level 1
misbehaviors, reduce by 1 severity level.
Calculate each type of mitigating circumstance separately and reduce accordingly;
this means, for example, that for ages 5 to 7 for level 2 to 5 misbehavior a
reduction of up to 2 severity levels is possible. Regardless of age, severity
level cannot be reduced to 0; assign these cases to level 1.
Age related aggravating circumstances: for physical ages 17 and 18, increase
severity level by 1; for physical ages 19 and 20, increase severity level by 2.
Other aggravating circumstances: for each previous instance of same
behavior (not severity level) in previous 2 months, increase severity level 1
per instance. For 3 or more level 3 or higher misbehavior instances in
past 45 days or 4 or more instances of level 3 or higher misbehavior in
previous 3 months increase severity level by a total of 1per instance up to 2
levels. Do not combine both of these aggravating circumstances; if both
are applicable, use the one that results in the greater increase in
level. (Note: 4 or more level 2 or higher misbehavior instances within a
45 day period or 3 or more level 3 or higher misbehavior instances in a 90 day
period may indicate a need for a Commissioner's proceeding and Discipline
Order.)
Calculate each type of aggravating circumstance separately and increase
accordingly; this means, for example, that a 19 year old with 3 or more level 3
or higher misbehaviors (other than for same behavior) in past 90 days will be
increased 4 levels, 2 for age and 2 for the multiple misbehaviors.
Maximum severity level by age: for ages 5 to 7, severity level cannot exceed
5. For ages 8 to 12 severity level cannot exceed 10. For ages 13
and 14 severity level cannot exceed 12. For ages 15 and older, severity
level cannot exceed 15.
It is crucial to understand that child discipline proceedings are not
judicial in nature, they are purely administrative. That's why the system
uses "child" instead of "juvenile" and terms like
consequences instead of sanctions or sentences. When either police or Child
Discipline Enforcement Officers take control of a child for transport to a discipline
center, the child is not under arrest or in custody or considered detained,
rather they're under "disciplinary control" of the officer or
officers.
Police and Discipline officers can take children under disciplinary control for
transport to the nearest open CDAC for misdemeanor criminal type behavior,
status offenses involving curfew, alcohol, or tobacco, non-compliance with a
consequence or discipline order and for resisting the efforts of a parent,
school or other person with authority over them to take them to a CDAC.
Further, in the United States, the law stipulates that a child under
disciplinary control for reasonable cause to believe the child engaged in
non-compliance with a consequence or discipline order, resistance to being
taken to a CDAC, or a delinquent act and children admitting to behavior under
CDAC jurisdiction must immediately become nude, if not already so, and be
transported to the CDAC naked. Other than children already under a consequence
or discipline order, these are the only children who arrive at a CDAC already
naked. If a child required to do so either before transport or at a CDAC after
issuance of a consequence or discipline Order doesn't willingly cooperate in
stripping naked, his or clothing can be removed by any means necessary
including ripping or cutting off.
If a child is taken under disciplinary control for resistance or the child's
clothing has to be forcibly removed either in the field or at the CDAC, this is
considered defiance and disrespect of authority resulting in a mandatory increase
of 2 levels over what otherwise would be imposed, with the minimal level being
6 since the normal defiance and disrespect level is 4, as discussed above. All
the additional penalties, as discussed later in this document, for defiance,
disrespect or bullying apply.
Upon arrival at a CDAC, if a consequence order is issued, prior to his or her
spanking, the naked child is placed in an open to the public (with purchased
ticket) display area for a period of time equal to 10 minutes multiplied by
adjusted severity level, with a maximum period of 20 minutes for ages 5-7, 45
minutes for ages 8-9, 60 minutes for ages 10-12, 75 minutes for ages 13-15, and
90 minutes for ages 16 and up. These ages are physical age, not
disciplinary age. After this display time, children are taken to what has
become known as a Painatorium to receive their spanking. Painatoriums are
with purchased ticket open to the public small auditoriums with up to 12 rows
of seats with a maximum of 250 seats. Many CDACs have more than one Painatorium;
those in heavily populated areas may have up to six, and in some very large
cities, as many as eight. After the spanking, the child is again placed in the
display area for the same amount of time as for his or her pre-spanking display
time.
Children can be brought to CDACs by parents, school authorities familiar with
the school related misbehavior, or under disciplinary control of an enforcement
or police officer. When a school or officer transports a child, parents
must be notified as soon as possible, preferably before the child's arrival at
the CDAC. If a parent can reach the CDAC in a reasonable time, typically
within 1 hour of child's arrival, processing will be delayed until parent is on
scene. Parents need not be present for imposition and carrying out of
consequence orders; they must be present for all evaluations, proceedings, and
hearings related to discipline orders. Upon completion of any CDAC
imposed spanking and display time, a parent or school official, as appropriate
for time of day and case, must take custody of the child; children will be held
at the CDAC nude in an open to public viewing waiting area until such custody
is effectuated. Parents who unduly or unreasonably delay taking custody
of their child can and usually are prosecuted for criminal child neglect.
The United States determined that the primary spanking implement to be used was
a soft initiation leather six tailed martinet. This martinet was chosen
as, depending on strength of stoke, it produces a moderate to intense stinging
sensation without causing damage other than reddening the buttocks and at
higher durations or strength, possible mild to moderate bruising.
This characteristic allows when appropriate for severity of the misbehavior the
imposing of a high number of strokes without imparting serious injury.
Key to overall severity of spankings is the child's assigned discipline age.
Discipline age is determined by what age in terms of years and 4 months most
closely matches for the child's sex the 50th percentile for the child's actual
height and weight; children are nude for these measurements, which are done at
an open to public viewing station near the CDAC's public entrance. If
there's an age difference between height and weight percentiles, the weight age
is used whether it's higher or lower; this puts overweight kids at a distinct
disadvantage.
The spanking machines are calibrated so a stroke delivered at 90% of the
machine's maximum force is equivalent to what most people would consider being
slightly less than hard. Strokes delivered at 50% of maximum force
approximate a moderate spanking, strokes delivered at 10% of maximum equate to
a mild spanking. This calibration allows for safe imposition of a high
number of spanks, such as 70 for a discipline age 14 child at severity level 5
or 112 for a discipline age 16 child at level 7. Additionally, severity
of strokes are determined by child's discipline age starting at 10% of maximum
for age 5 and increasing in 5% increments for each age past 5. This scale
results in 8 year olds receiving strokes at 25% of maximum force, 13 year olds
at 50% and 18 year olds at 75% of maximum. Physical age instead of
discipline age is used for 19 and 20 year olds.
Severity of spankings is determined by three factors: assigned adjusted
severity level of the behavior, child's discipline age, and strength of strokes
as determined by child's discipline age. The number of strokes is determined by
multiplying the child's disciplinary age by the child's assessed severity level
for the behavior leading to the issuance of the consequence or discipline
order. Starting at severity level 3, the martinet also delivers genital
spanks and anal spanks each equal in number to the severity level. The genital
spanks are delivered at 60% of the force of the child's buttocks spanks.
For behaviors involving disrespect, defiance, bullying, or delinquent acts
(violation of law that would be a crime if done by an adult) the number of
martinet anal spanks doubles and the spanking includes cane strokes equal to 3
more than the severity level and additional anal and genital spanks each equal
to assigned severity level. These additional anal and genital spanks, separate
from those with the martinet, are delivered with special anal and genital imitation
horsehide straps; the canings are delivered by a plastic imitation cane
designed with features to cause slight skin penetration of slightly more than
1/32 of an inch, very visible dark red or purple welts, and to maximize burn
and sting.
For their spankings, children are secured lying on their back on a purpose
build spanking bed, similar in design to a physician's examination table.
The child is face up with feet secured in widely spaced stirrups positioned
high enough to force the child's buttocks completely up in the air and off the
table. A wide strap positioned just below the breast area secures the
child's arms and chest to the bed. This position leaves the child's
spread wide apart bottom facing the audience, with anus and genitals clearly visible.
This position was adopted as the worldwide CDAC standard because of the high
level of embarrassment, humiliation and sense of vulnerability caused the child
and the easy accessibility to those areas to be chastised.
Above the table a very large high definition monitor faces the audience.
The left third displays a close up of the child's face; the other two-thirds
display a close up of the child's exposed buttocks, anus, and genitals.
Below the monitor, a digital countdown display lists the child's name, physical
age, discipline age, type of order issued; reason for the order, assigned
spanking methods and assigned strokes for each method.
All spanking implements come in five sizes and weights, to appropriately
accommodate different size children and for the genital straps, different sized
genitals. For the martinet, anal strap, cane, and for girls the genital
strap, size is based on the child's assigned discipline age: kindergarten for
ages 5-7, pee wee for ages 8-11, juvenile for ages 12-14, junior for ages
15-17, and youth for ages 18-20. For boys, the 5 genital strap sizes
correspond to the child's Tanner Sexual Maturity Rating: kindergarten for SMR
1, pee wee for SMR 2, juvenile for SMR 3, junior for SMR 4, and youth for SMR
5. (On the Sexual Maturity Rating scale SMR stage 1 is pre-pubertal, SMR
stage 5 is a child at or final or near his or her final adult genital size for
boys and adult breast size for girls.).
Under certain circumstances, supplemental pain techniques using specially designed
dildos and hot seats can be used except for child physical age 5 to 7.
Disciplinary dildos are designed to be very painful upon insertion, and to
remain painful while inserted. For any given child, dildos are used that
are close to the maximum size that can be inserted without causing injury other
than pain and possibly some anal bruising. Sizes range in 1/8 inch
diameter increments from 5/8 inch to 1-7/8 inches. Consequence orders for
behavior assigned level 6 or above before any upgrade or downgrade for
aggravating or mitigating circumstances always include a dildo consequence.
This consequence requires daily insertions equal to the final adjusted for
aggravating or mitigating circumstances severity level but not to exceed 8 or
be less than 3 per day. Duration of each insertion is equal in minutes to
the child's adjusted severity level. For violation of any consequence or
discipline order and for any case in which they can issue a community property
or sexual humiliation order (discussed further below) commissioners can include
a dildo component. At their discretion this can be for between 3 to 8
times per day, but cannot be less than could be imposed for the behavior level,
if any, of the behavior that ultimately resulted in issuance of the discipline
order. Length of time of insertion is also at the Commissioner's
discretion, but like insertions, cannot be less than could be imposed for the
underlying behavior level, if any and in no case can exceed 30 minutes. Dildos
can be mounted on specially designed seats to accommodate situations, such as
in school, where the child needs to remain seated.
For cases where it's desirable to encourage cooperation between several
children, such as siblings where each is under a discipline order for constantly
squabbling and arguing with each other, special dildos designed to be worn by
several children at the same time can be used. These come in 2, 3 and 4
person models with interchangeable prongs to safely accommodate the proper size
thickness for each child. Commissioners can mandate use of multi-person
models for up to 4 times a day and for up to 45 minutes each time.
Children subject to these quickly learn that the more they cooperate with each
other in coordinating movements and actions, the less painful it is for each of
them.
Hot seats are designed to rapidly heat to a temperature just a few degrees
below burning. The area of the seat to be heated and the seat's sliding back
and side plates are all adjustable to ensure a snug fit and that only the child's
entire bare bottom, but not any other body area, is heated to a painful but not
scalding temperature. Commissioners must order these seats to be used in
cases of bullying with any combination of violence, victim injury or victim
emotional harm. Except for extraordinary mitigating circumstances, they also
almost always order their use in felony delinquent cases. At their
discretion, Commissioners can order their use for the most serious grade of
delinquent misdemeanor behavior and for violations of court, consequence, or
discipline orders. They cannot be used in any case not mentioned above,
such as a lack of self discipline case or a status offense, unless it involves
violation of an order. Commissioners can order children to use the seats
up to 3 times a day for a maximum of 20 minutes per time.
All consequence and discipline orders include a specified number of nudity
days. For nudity time, a day is the 24 hour period starting at 7:00 a.m.
on a calendar day and ending at 7:00 a.m. the next calendar day. For
consequence orders, nudity time is for the number of days equal to the assigned
severity level plus the remainder of the day on which the order was
issued. For disrespect, defiance, bullying and delinquent acts nudity
time doubles to twice the number of days equal to the severity level plus the
remainder of day order was issued. For discipline orders, the initial
nudity time ranges between 7 and 90 days, as follows:
Status offense - legislative imposed curfew violation less than 20 minutes: 0
days
Status offense - legislative imposed curfew violation 20 or more minutes: 7 days
Delinquent act - infraction or lowest level misdemeanor: 7 days
Delinquent act -next higher to lowest level misdemeanor: 10 days
Status offense - continued truancy after appropriate efforts to eliminate causes: 21 days
Delinquent act - all other misdemeanor acts except highest level: 21 days
Violation of court order, discipline order, or consequence order: 21 days
Failure to cooperate with treatment, counseling or placements to alleviate running away: 21 days
Delinquent act - highest level misdemeanor: 30 days
Lack of self discipline - persistent misbehavior: 30 days
Bullying - without violence, victim injury or victim emotional harm: 30 days
Lack of self discipline - not doing what is expected or is required to achieve goals: 45 days
Lack of self confidence: 45 days
Delinquent act - lowest level felony: 60 days
Bullying - with any combination of violence, victim injury or victim emotional harm: 60 days
Delinquent act - felony act other than lowest level: 90 days
Delinquent act -
violent felony act: 120 days (rarely referred from court)
For Discipline Orders related to a persistent lack of self discipline causing
the child to repeatedly fail to do what is expected by society or to do what is
necessary to succeed at personal goals and for lack of self confidence, the
initial period of 45 days can based on circumstances be reduced to 30
days. For all Discipline Orders, if necessary to achieve the goals of the
order, anytime after issuance of the initial order more days can be added in
whatever increment deemed necessary. Addition days can continue to be
added until it's determined by the commissioner that the child has developed
sufficient self discipline or self confidence. Including added time, the
maximum nudity period is 5 months for other than felony delinquent acts and 9
months for felony delinquent acts.
In formulating the Initiative, great care was taken to avoid creating a result
in which either too few or too many children would be nude on any given day or
on average children were nude an excessive number of days. If too few children
are nude at any one time, the program jeopardizes public acceptance of
disciplinary nudity as being the standard. It also loses its deterrent value
since children perceive public nudity as being a very unlikely consequence for
their misbehavior. Too many children nude on an average day or for an
excessive number of days results in children perceiving public nudity as the new
normal for them and that no matter what they do, good or bad, more days than
not they're going to be naked, embarrassed, humiliated and spanked. Under
those circumstances, they won't see avoiding public nudity and the other CDAC
consequences as a deterrent to misbehavior and undisciplined actions.
Research revealed a range likely to be the most effective. Target for the
primary CDAC audience of ages 10 to 17 is 6% of boys and 3% of girls each day
with percentages varying by age. With younger and older children added to the
mix the overall percentage drops somewhat. The precise percentage by age and
sex, along with other data, is in a table at the end of this document.
The range is from less than 0.1% for 5 year old girls to 7.4% for 13 year old
boys with the other ages between those limits. As the table shows, at an
average of 24 days per child, the average highest number of days per year nude
is also for 13 year old boys. Bear in mind that the numbers in the table
statistics are averages only measured across each specified age; some children
will have higher numbers, some lower, and some in any one year period will have
no CDAC referrals at all and thus 0 nudity days.
Another method utilized to keep nudity levels effective is to limit CDAC
referrals. As discussed above, generally referrals cannot be made for
less than level 3 behaviors. Level 3 misbehaviors require 2 or more
previous level 2 or higher misbehavior instances in past 45 days or 3 or more
instances in previous 3 months. Level 4 behaviors that meet the mitigating
circumstance criteria for downgrade to level 3 can only be referred if they
satisfy the requirements for a level 3 referral.
To assist in limiting referrals to appropriate cases, sometime between reaching
age 5 and starting kindergarten a computerized child discipline record is
established for each child; this is maintained in a secure nationwide database
that can accessed by CDACs and police worldwide and by the child's parents and
school; schools are limited to accessing school related behaviors. Parents are
encouraged to visit any nearby CDAC or elementary school as soon possible after
the child's fifth birthday to set up the record. The CDAC or school visit
is necessitated by the need to scan the child's right index finger. This
scan is used to identify the child and bring up his or her discipline record
when brought to a CDAC for possible issuance of an order. The scan can
also be used by schools to identify children, for example to ensure the correct
child reports to detention or to take a placement test and to access school
records; by health care providers to access a child's computerized health
record; and by enforcement and police officers when they need to identify a
child for any reason, such as recovery of a lost, missing or injured child or
to access when appropriate for the case a child's discipline record and when
permissible by law, their juvenile court records. As the child grows and
matures, this finger scan is periodically retaken to allow for shape, size and
pattern changes.
If a discipline record has not yet been set up when the child is enrolled for
kindergarten, it is at that time. Once the record is established, parents
can access it from any internet enabled device by using the user friendly
access website or a free app. Parents are encouraged to enter all
instances of misbehavior not entered into the system by others such as schools,
police or CDACs and to enter the details, including frequency, of behavior
indicating a possible need for a discipline order for persistent lack of self
discipline or self confidence. Entering this data assists greatly in
ensuring the proper level consequence order is issued and in determining if
issuance of a discipline order is indicated.
Each time a parent enters a behavior, the system will indicate if the criteria
for CDAC referral is met or not and if a discipline order is indicated.
For behavior at level 3 or below before downgrade, for the first 2 instances in
a year meeting referral criteria, the parent, unless there is school or police
involvement, can decide not to bring the child to a CDAC for an order.
Failure to bring the child for a third or subsequent level 3 behavior in a year
or for any level 4 or higher behavior or when a discipline order is indicated
subjects the parent to potential prosecution for misdemeanor criminal child
neglect.
Any person bringing a child to a CDAC 2 or more times in a year or 3 or more
times in a 2 year period when CDAC referral criteria for a consequence or
discipline order is not met also subjects themselves to potential child neglect
charges. For purposes of the provisions pertaining to neglect, if both parents
reside with each other, they are treated as if one person; this is to prevent
an unfair doubling of exempt instances.
Children who violate any portion of their consequence or discipline order are
subject to additional consequences. A violation occurs anytime a child
fails to cooperate in undergoing any consequence or doing any action required
by the order, any time the child refuses or fails to do any action required by
the order, regardless of cause and anytime the child attempts in any manner to
cover his or her genitals, buttocks, or breasts.
As part of the humiliation and embarrassment process, it is a standard CDAC
policy and a CDI rule that when children are under a consequence or discipline
order that their now no longer private parts are referred to by the common
slang words as are girls' breasts. It is completely sociably acceptable and
expected to call those body parts by words such as dick, cock, prick, balls,
pussy, tits and boobs. Even childish euphemisms such as willy and birdie
for the penis and kitty for the vulva are encouraged for their embarrassment
potential.
Under specified circumstances, children can be declared public property.
Public property children can be touched anywhere on their body, especially
genitals, buttocks, and breasts, by parents, any adult in authority over the
child such as teachers, coaches, police, CDAC personnel, any person the child's
parent or person in authority give permission to, siblings regardless of age,
and any child under age 19. These specified people may touch those parts
anyway they want, for as long as they want, anywhere they want, in front of
whomever they want. Assessment Officers impose community property for
behavior involving disrespect, defiance, bullying, or delinquent acts; they
cannot impose this consequence for other behaviors.
As provided by law, except for status offenses involving curfew violations and
persistent runaways subject to commissioner jurisdiction for failure to comply
or cooperate with treatment, counseling or placement, commissioners other than
for extraordinary mitigating conditions always include being community property
in their discipline orders.
During their before and after spanking display time, all children are community
property whether or not under a community property consequence. By law, during
their display time all children, even if not community property can be touched
and handled by anyone in attendance, including those who ordinarily cannot
touch community property children. Primary purpose of this is to
reinforce to the on display children not community property how much worse they
could have it if they continue to engage in inappropriate behaviors or fail to
develop self discipline or confidence.
The standard, but not required, manner for those permitted to touch children
under a community property order to greet such children is to shake the penises
of boys 5 to 8 times and to use one hand to rub up and down their vulvas and
the other hand to rub the breasts of girls, giving a total of 5 to 8 rubs to
each body area.
Forced masturbation consequences are required to be issued by Assessment
Officers for all behaviors for which they must issue a community property
consequence, i.e., for disrespect, defiance, bullying, or delinquent acts; they
cannot impose this consequence for other behaviors. Commissioners must also
include this in any discipline order arising out those behaviors; they may, but
are not required to, include it in any other order that includes a community
property component. Under a forced masturbation consequence, parents, any
adult in authority and siblings can order the child to masturbate to orgasm,
regardless of who's watching or where they are. Number of times required to
masturbate per day is set to equal the assigned severity level, additional
times can be added as a penalty for not cooperating at any stage of the
disciplinary or consequence process. Maximum times in a day cannot exceed
seven; to facilitate the multiple masturbations in a day, the child is usually
under an additional condition to take an appropriate disciplinary drug intended
to increase frequency and duration of sexual arousals.
Under certain circumstances, commissioners can include in a discipline order a
requirement that up to 3 times a day the child engage in oral sex with other
children under a similar order. Commissioners generally use this option
for a second or subsequent violation of a court, consequence or discipline
order and for children issued a discipline order within 15 months of being
issued a previous discipline order. They are required by law to always
impose this condition for bullying with any combination of violence, victim
injury or victim emotional harm and for felony delinquent acts involving
weapons, injury to others, or assault or battery. They may include it for other
felony delinquent acts and for misdemeanor delinquent acts causing serious
injury to others. If under a forced masturbation order, the daily number
of required masturbations is reduced by the number of required daily oral sex
sessions. An oral sex order cannot be issued for any situation not listed
in this paragraph and cannot be issued for children physical age 5 to 7.
For all orgasms, no matter who caused the orgasm or the reason, the child must
loudly announce "I'm cumming." This announcement is a
requirement of all orders, not just those with community property, forced
masturbation, or other sexual humiliation components. This means,
for example, a child under a standard level 3 consequence level without any
sexual components who masturbates in the privacy of his or her own bedroom must
proclaim any resultant orgasm loudly enough for everyone who's awake in the
house to hear.
Various disciplinary dugs are used in conjunction with the Child Discipline
Initiative, except for physical ages 5 to 7. Puermax for boys and
Puellamax for girls cause the child to be in a very noticeable state of sexual arousal
for approximately 13.5 hours of the 15 continuous hours that the daily dose is
effective. During the 15 hour period the child will experience between 5
and 9 periods of non-arousal, each ranging in duration from 10 to 20 minutes
with total non-arousal time of approximately 90 minutes. Both drugs
increase sensitively and responsiveness to sexual stimulation; some children
had been known to occasionally reach orgasm simply by a strong breeze or by
vigorous physical activity. The two drugs also increase the number of
orgasms a child can achieve in a day and noticeably lessen the interval needed
between orgasms, with the most dramatic effect being among ejaculatory pubertal
boys. Puermax and Puellamax differ from drugs intended to treat erectile dysfunction
in that the two disciplinary drugs produce an almost continuous period of
arousal for a prolonged period of time. By contrast, erectile dysfunction
drugs do not normally caused prolonger arousal; rather, they allow the person
to reach arousal when, as one advertisement puts it, "the mood is
right." Assessment Officers are required to order the use of Puermax
or Puellamax for any behavior involving disrespect, defiance, bullying, or
delinquent acts; they cannot impose this consequence for other behaviors.
Commissioners can order use of the drugs in any case they deem their use
helpful in achieving the goal of instilling self discipline or self
confidence.
Pubertrol and Pubregress were developed from the early onset puberty treatment
drug Puberhalt. As the name implies, Puberhalt stops further pubertal
development in children suffering from early onset puberty, a condition
commonly known as precious puberty. Strict government regulations,
medical association standards, and manufacture's guidelines all mandate that
when a child on Puberhalt is at the 65th percentile for sexual development for
the child's age and sex, the drug be discontinued so puberty can resume its
course. Of particular interest to the researchers developing the
disciplinary equivalents was the repeatedly observed phenomenon that Puberhalt
almost always caused a very small decrease in a child's height and weight, in a
boy's genital size, and a girl's breast size. The developers wanted to
very much enhance these size reduction characteristics and ultimately succeeded
in doing so.
Pubertrol-DB for boys and Pubertrol-DG for girls revert children at Tanner
Sexual Maturity Rating stage 2 (early puberty) back to stage 1
(pre-puberty.) The drugs prevent children naturally at stage 1 children
and children reverted to stage 1 from stage 2 from any pubertal progression and
from any growth of genitals for boys and breasts for girls. Pubertrol
tends to make a boy's genitals and a girl's breasts about 5% smaller than the
last time they were at stage 1. The drugs also make children 1% to 2%
smaller in height and weight than immediately before being put on the drug. It
takes 2 to 5 days for Pubertrol to achieve full regression and final size
reduction, with the average being 3 days.
Pubregress, available in DB form for boys and DG for girls, is intended for
stage 3, stage 4, and those stage 5 children who are still developing toward
their final full adult genital size for boys and breast size for girls.
Like Pubertrol, the two drugs regresses the child back to stage 1 and prevents
the child from achieving any pubertal progression and from any growth of
genitals for boys and breasts for girls. Pubertrol tends to make a boy's
genitals and a girl's breasts about 10% smaller than the last time they were at
stage 1. The drugs also make children 2 to 3% smaller in height and weight than
immediately before being put on the drug. It takes 3 to 8 days for Pubertrol to
achieve full regression and final size reduction, with the average being 3 days
for stage 3, 4 days for stage 4, and 5 days for stage 5.
Assessment Officers are required to order the use of Pubertrol or Pubregress
for any behavior involving bullying with any combination of violence, victim
injury or victim emotional harm; felony delinquent acts involving weapons,
injury to others, assault or battery; and misdemeanor delinquent acts that
cause serious injury to others. They cannot impose this consequence for other
behaviors. In any situation in which they issue a community property order, commissioners
can order use of Pubertrol and Pubregress if they feel its use will help in
achieving the goal of instilling self discipline or self confidence.
Whether naturally or through regression, children at stage 1 are always devoid
of pubic and underarm hair and only achieve dry orgasms. Once off Pubertrol or
Pubregress, children's height and weight growth, pubic and underarm hair
development, ability to reach wet orgasms, boys genital growth and girls breast
growth proceed about twice as fast as when they were first put on the drug
until reaching the size and development level they would have been at for their
current age if they hadn't been regressed.
In colder weather, to avoid nude children from suffering hyperthermia or
frostbite, special nanotechnology clothing items and accessories were developed
to generate around the child a heat shield of between 68 and 75 degrees
Fahrenheit or 20 to 24 degrees Celsius, depending on outside temperature. These
items contain numerous nanotechnology cells that interact with the body's
galvanic energy and surface chemistry to produce heat.
The preferred and most commonly used heat producing item is a set of nanotech
bands. The set consists of 2 thin 1/4 inch wide bands positioned slightly above
the elbow, 2 bands each 3/16 inch wide worn around the wrist in similar fashion
to a watchband, a 1/2 inch band worn just below the breast area, and 4 bands
3/8 inch wide with 2 of these worn around the upper thighs and 2 around the
lower calves about 2 to inches above the ankles. All bands except for the
right wrist use hook and loop fasteners to permit adjusting fit and easy
removal; additionally, bands come in 5 sizes. These bands in all
directions radiate heat a little more than 1.5 inches out from the child's
body; the band beneath the breast area radiates far enough to keep both breasts
warm. The bands are effective in weather as low as 25 degrees Fahrenheit
or -4 degrees Celsius.
For weather at temperatures lower than the bands can handle and for moderate to
heavy snow and cold rain, special clear see through ponchos can be worn.
The bands are worn inside the ponchos, many models have the bands embedded; the
ponchos also include additional nanotech cells to generate additional
heat. As with the bands, the ponchos generate a 68 to 75 degree heat
shield, depending on outside temperature. All ponchos leave the genitals,
buttocks, and breasts uncovered to provide easy access; the heat shield extends
out sufficient distance to keep these exposed areas warm.
The right wrist band is always worn; it includes a microchip containing the
details of the child's consequence or discipline order, including any
modifications made for violations of the order. Using a free app, these
chips can be read by any device equipped with an infrared reader. These bands
are red and are marked with color stripes and lettering to indicate what
consequences the child is under; yellow with the letter "N" for
nudity, blue (cyan) with letter "C" for community property, purple
with a "M" for public masturbation, orange with an "O" for
oral sex, green with "PM" for Puermax and Puellamax, and black with
"PR" for Pubertrol and Pubregress. The band is also imprinted with
the last day the child's order is in effect. Whenever the child's
consequences are modified, the child is issued an updated band and microchip
reflecting those changes. Once fitted, these right wrist bands and
microchips can only be removed by a CDAC using a special tool.
Funding for the Initiative, the various agencies and the CDACs come from
various sources. A small percentage, .25%, of federal and state income
taxes is dedicated to child discipline funding. The federal government,
and most states impose a 1% sales tax on discipline related merchandise
purchased by consumers; these include spanking implements, punishment dildos,
nanotech clothing items, books and videos on child discipline, and
professionally produced videos depicting actual CDAC spankings and
display time as well as in public community property and sexual humiliations.
(Children appearing in these videos, and their families, receive
compensation.) CDACs charge admission roughly equivalent to the price of
a cinema ticket for access to Painatoriums and display areas; teens and
children are charged reduced rates. Tickets are valid for a particular
Painatorium within the issuing CDAC and, depending on time of day and day of
week for a 2, 3 or 4 hour session. Similar to modern multiplex cinemas,
session start times are staggered among a CDAC's Painatoriums to keep wait
times for next available session as short as possible. (Family members of
children being spanked or on display are admitted free to Painatoriums and
display areas.) CDACs also sell annual passes; these passes are for any
CDAC within a specified area, usually the judicial district where the CDAC is
located. At a higher price than the local pass, passes can be bought
valid for any CDAC in the state, and for an even higher price for any
CDAC in the country. All CDACs also operate shops selling all the merchandise
subject to the 1% discipline item sales tax as well as associated items.
(Nanotech items, dildos and other items required for a particular order are
loaned to the parents free of charge; parents may elect to purchase their own,
usually upgraded, versions.) Additional funding comes from dedicating
approximately 50% of the savings in the judicial, juvenile, educational and
other family serving systems resulting from the Initiative.
Appendix:
Statistical Technical Details
Average number of Percentage of Children
Average nudity
Nude on any
CDAC
referrals
per year
issued
days
per year
given day
per
year per child discipline
orders
per
child
Age Boys Girls
Boys
Girls
Boys
Girls
Boys
Girls
5 0.5%
0.1%
1
<1
N/A
N/A
2
<1
6 1.0%
0.3%
1.5
<1
N/A
N/A
4
1
7 1.4%
0.8%
1.5
1
N/A
N/A
5
3
8 3.3%
1.9%
2
1
7%
3%
10
6
9 3.9%
1.9%
2
1
7%
3%
12
6
10 4.1%
1.9%
3
1
7%
3%
13
6
11 5.6%
2.8%
4
2
8%
4%
18
9
12 6.8%
3.5%
5
3
9%
6%
21 11
13 7.4%
4.4%
6
4
10%
7%
24 14
14 6.8%
3.8%
5
3
10%
6%
21
12
15 6.0%
3.2%
4
2
10%
5%
19 10
16 5.7%
2.2%
4
1
9%
4%
18
7
17 3.9%
1.8%
3
1
8%
2%
12
6
18 1.9% 1.2%
2
<1
3%
<1%
6
4
19 1.5%
0.9%
2
<1
2%
<1%
5
3
20 1.5%
0.6%
1
<1
1%
<1%
5
2
Notes:
Nude on any day percentages are for nudity days from both consequence and
discipline orders.
Average nudity days per year are for consequence orders only.
On average, discipline orders generate 30 nudity days per order.
Ages 5 to 7 not subject to discipline orders; can only be issued consequence
orders.
Ages 18 to 20 only include only those who meet the legal definition of being a
child, i.e., those who have not yet graduated high school or received a
certificate of equivalency. This is approximately 67% of 18 year olds and
depending on locality, 10% to 20% of 19 year olds and 5% to 10% of 20 year
olds. To become an adult as soon as possible, the majority of non-graduate 19
and 20 year olds and those non-graduate 18 year olds not still in school
actively work toward graduating or earning a certificate of equivalency.