Santa
Strikes Back Again (Public nudity, spank,
oral, humil, nc, multiple
MF/bgmf)
By Nialos Leaning
[email protected]
Copyright 2014 by Nialos Leaning, all rights reserved.
Permission for noncommercial free (no charge) electronic
distribution and
personal use reproduction of this story is hereby granted. All such
distribution, re-posting and reproduction must be without alteration of
this
story in any way, must include this entire copyright notice, and must
in their
entireties retain the following statements:
This story is intended for ADULTS ONLY. It takes place in the Child
Discipline
Initiative story universe created by Nialos Leaning and depicts preteen
and
teen boys and girls on Santa's naughty list and other children being
punished
with public nudity, sexual humiliation, and spanking. If you are not of
a legal
age in your locality to view such material, or if such material does
not appeal
to you, do not read further, and do not save this story.
This story is pure fantasy, written for the enjoyment of adults.
Behavior
depicted in this story may in real life be illegal or considered by
society to
be abusive, harmful, unacceptable or undesirable. The author does not
advocate,
condone nor personally engage in any such behavior.
This story, as is all fiction, is fantasy and not reality. The author
does
recognize the difference between the two. Please do understand that
some of us,
including the author, enjoy such fantasy material.
Compliments and constructive criticism are always welcome.
* * * * *
Author's Note:
While this story involves Santa and children on his naughty
list, it is not
a Christmas themed story. Rather, it serves as an
introduction to the
Child Discipline Initiative story universe. Authors who wish
to write
stories set in this universe are most welcome to do so provided their
stories
acknowledge they are set in the Child Discipline Initiative story
universe
created by Nialos Leaning and substantially adhere to the principles,
policies,
philosophies, procedures, practices and organizational and operational
structure presented in Santa Strikes Back Again
and the Child
Discipline Imitative Condensed Overview and Technical Summary.
Stories
need not make mention of Santa, the North Pole, or Santa's 'Spank
Shops; they
may be in any locale and setting the story author desires.
Perspective authors can obtain the aforementioned Child
Discipline
Imitative Condensed Overview and Technical Summary
by sending me a request
at [email protected]
* * * * *
Santa Strikes Back Again
By Nialos Leaning
Three Months after Last Christmas
"Next hiney to be spanked!" loudly boomed the Child
Discipline Consequence Officer currently on temporary assignment to the
North
Pole Child Discipline Assistance Center. These centers, commonly
referred to as
CDACS, were the cornerstone of the fairly new Child Discipline
Initiative being
introduced by governments worldwide.
"I don't need a spanking," declared the blushing, naked, and just
turned 14 year old Thomas to the female officer, "and I don't need to
be
naked, either!"
"Let's find out, shall we?" replied the Consequence Officer as she
placed Thomas' right index finger on the scanner. "Ah, here are your
details now. The Child Discipline Assessment Officer decided you do;
after all,
you did admit that you've been bossing your two younger siblings
around,
including making them do some of your chores and waiting on you."
"I did do that stuff, but I won't anymore," not so assuredly asserted
Thomas.
"I hope you don't, Tommy," answered the Consequence Officer,
"because if you're back at a Child Discipline Assistance Center again
for
the same behavior, the consequences will be much worse for you."
"I said I won't anymore," was the boy's well intentioned albeit
somewhat doubtful reply, "and please don't call me Tommy." Thomas
absolutely hated being called Tommy now that in his mind he was a grown
up
teenager.
"Tommy, when you misbehave, you're called by a little kid's name. It's
a
CDAC rule. And, it's Santa's rule, too."
"I don't believe in Santa, I'm too old for that. And what's
with all
this fake North Pole crap anyway?" Thomas blustered in an
attempt to
hide his confusion. One moment he was up in his room playing
one of the
video games he'd received for Christmas; the next moment, as if by
magic, he
was downstairs in the family living room in front of his parents, his
younger
brother and sister, and a man and woman he didn't recognize.
The man introduced
himself as a Child Discipline Assessment Officer and the woman as a
Child
Discipline Enforcement Officer, assertions that startled Thomas as
their
community's CDAC was months away from completion. The man
questioned the
boy about some misbehavior that he'd been involved in for the past 2
months.
Thomas, an always honest child, reluctantly admitted to the
behavior. As
soon as he admitted his culpability, as if by some unknown magic, he
found
himself naked in front of everyone present. Seconds later, he
and
everyone in the room were in this to his mind phony North Pole place.
"Santa, and his North Pole operation are very much real," simply
stated the officer. "Thanks to Santa's magic, you're here in your
birthday
suit showing off all you have, or more precisely, don't have, because
you've
made Santa's naughty list and your local CDAC isn't operating yet. Now,
let's
get on with your consequences."
Hearing this exchange as he passed the officer's station, Santa paused
on his
way to his very important update briefing with his executive staff and
invited
guests from various child discipline agencies. Three months
after
Christmas, and what was supposed to be a temporary CDAC at the North
pole was
still operating, dealing not only with a large backlog of children on
the
naughty list but also with the many children from areas without yet
functioning
CDACs. The frustrated parents of children not visited by
Santa's Naughty
List Patrol arranged their own travel and lodging by booking online
either
a very affordable vacation or extended weekend package at the easy to
use
website of Santa's now very profitable North Pole Hospitality and
Travel
Agency, Inc. He hoped the news at the upcoming meeting would
be good
concerning progress toward full implementation of the still developing
Child
Discipline Initiative. Most countries already had some
operating CDACs,
but many of those countries were far from full coverage, with many
CDACs still
under development and construction. Santa continued to listen
and observe.
"Please, can't I have another punishment like grounding or a loss of
privileges, instead," Thomas desperately made a last minute plea.
"You've already lost a privilege, the privilege of wearing clothes for
the
rest of the day and the next three days."
"That's not what I had in mind," half muttered, half uttered Thomas.
"Tommy, except sometimes for level 1, public nudity is always part of
the
child discipline procedure. Through research and evidence,
we've found
that for children a combination of humiliation, embarrassment and pain
is the
most effective way to achieve a positive change and a correction of a
lapse or
lack of self discipline."
"You don't have to call me a child, either," Thomas almost
shouted. "I'm a teenager, for cripes sakes."
"Until you're a legal adult, the law considers you a child.
In your
country of the United States and in my country of Canada, people are
now
considered a child until they reach age 18, if they've graduated from
high
school. If they haven't graduated, they're a child until they
graduate
with a diploma or Certificate of High School Equivalency or they reach
age 21,
whichever is first to occur."
"But, but, but," stuttered the flustered Thomas, unable to get his
thoughts out.
"Listen Tommy," the Consequence Officer informed the child,
"you're lucky that at your parents' request the Assessment Officer
agreed
to issue you a Child Consequence Order instead of sending you to a
Commissioner
for issuance of a Child Discipline Order; bullies like you are almost
always
sent to a Commissioner. Even though you were defiant and disrespectful
by
continuing in bullying your siblings after your parents repeatedly told
you not
to do so, he was lenient with you by assigning you a level 3
consequence
instead of the level 4 that's standard for defiance and disrespect or
the level
5 that's the norm for non-violent bullying and didn't give you any of
the extra
consequences for those types of behavior. He, and the computer, took
into
consideration that this behavior was all recent, hadn't been going on
too long,
wasn't overly serious, and prior to it you've generally been an
unusually well
behaved and mannered child."
"Big fucking deal," vehemently exclaimed Thomas, "I still have
to be naked and be spanked."
"Boy, that language just earned you the extra consequences for level 4
disrespect and defiance. That means you're now naked for an
additional 5
days for a total of today and 8 more instead of the standard of today
plus your
consequence level."
"No!" shouted Tommy, "today and 3 more days is already
embarrassing enough."
Ignoring his outburst, the officer continued her litany of the extras
befalling
the hapless Thomas. "Further, it means that in addition to
the 36
spanks with the martinet that you're due as a 12 year old at level 3..."
"I'm not fucking 12, I'm 14 you nitwit!" Thomas dangerously shouted
at the Consequence Officer.
"For that outburst, little boy, and your continued bad language, there
will be even more consequences. But, before we get to that,
let me
clarify your age for you. Yes, you're 14 years and 1 month
old, but your
height and weight puts you closest to the 50th percentile for a boy who
is 12
years and 4 months, so for discipline purposes you're considered 12
instead of
14. And, I might add, your genital development and hairless
state is much
more typical of many recently turned 12 year olds than a boy your own
age."
"I can't help it if I'm a late bloomer," Thomas defended
himself. "Dad says it runs in the family."
"Believe me Tommy you're far from the only underdeveloped teenager I've
seen since I've started working at CDACs," the officer reassured the
once
again deeply blushing fourteen year old whose genitals clearly were at
best
only about half way through Tanner Sexual Maturity Rating stage
2. His
penis was still little boy size sitting atop a barely visible but
small, tight,
and yet to drop scrotum somewhat smaller than half of a ping pong ball.
"Really?" asked Tommy.
"Yes, really. Now back to business. As I was saying
before you
interrupted and we got sidetracked, your height and weight makes your
assigned
discipline age 12. Discipline age is always determined by
what age in
terms of years and 4 months most closely matches for the child's sex
the 50th
percentile for the child's actual height and weight. If
there's an age
difference between height and weight, we go with weight whether it's
higher or
lower; that puts overweight kids at a distinct disadvantage.
Discipline
age is important because the number of spanks with the seven tailed
martinet
you get on your bare bottom is your assigned age times your discipline
level."
"At least being small for my age is good for something," said a
somewhat mollified Thomas.
"Yes it is," replied the officer. "Now back to your
consequences. For your most recent behavior here in front of
me, you're
now at level 5 and also have all the extra consequences that we give
for
defiance, disrespect, bullying, or delinquent criminal type
behavior. In
addition to your now 60 bare bottom spanks with the martinet, you'll
receive 8
strokes of the cane, 10 anal spanks from the very painful anal strap
and 5 hits
to your dick and balls from the also very painful genital strap.
Of
course, that's in addition to the anal and genital spanks you'll
receive as
part of your martinet spanking; these are always equal to your
discipline
level."
"Whoa, that's going to hurt!" declared a suddenly very concerned
Thomas.
"Yes it will; very much so. Because your repeated temper tantrums and
bad
language in front of me increased you to level 5, your caning increased
from
the 7, your genital strap spanking from the 4, and your anal strap
spanks from
the 8 you would get with the level 4 extra consequences for disrespect
and
defiance. For disrespect, defiance, bullying, and delinquent
criminal
behavior anal strap spanks are always double your discipline level,
genital
strap spanks always equal to your level, and caning always 3 more
strokes than
your discipline level. Also, your regular and extra nudity
time is now 10
days plus the rest of today and tonight. The computer automatically
doubles
nudity time for any behavior involving disrespect, defiance, bullying,
or a
criminal type delinquent act, so in your case you're actually nude
twice as
long as you otherwise would be for other misbehaviors."
Thomas saw no point in arguing these latest edicts, concerned that not
only
doing so would be futile but could very likely earn him even worse
consequences.
"The other two extra consequences for disrespect, defiance, bullying or
delinquent behavior that originally weren't going to be imposed by the
Assessment Officer also now apply to you. First of these is that your
parents,
any adult in authority, and your siblings can order you to masturbate
to
orgasm. Doesn't matter who's watching or where you are, they
tell you to
do it, you do it. You're also required to loudly announce
"I'm
cumming" whenever you cum, no matter who caused the orgasm, that's
another
standard CDAC rule. Again, as a penalty for your behavior here in front
of me,
I'm putting this at the level 5 total of 5 times a day, plus
1 additional
as an added penalty. The total for forced masturbation always
corresponds to
your assigned discipline level, unless, like with you, it's increased
for
penalty reasons."
"No fucking way!" Thomas hotly reacted to this proclamation.
Ignoring this latest obscenity from the boy's mouth, the Officer
continued with
the final consequence. "The last consequence is that your no longer
private parts are now public property. Your parents, any adult in
authority
over you such as teachers, coaches, police, CDAC personnel and any
person they
give permission to may touch those parts anyway they want, for as long
as they
want, anywhere they want, in front of whomever they want. So
can your two
siblings and any child under nineteen.
"That sucks," was Thomas' immediate response to the inclusion of this
humiliating indignity.
"If for whatever reason you end up in front of a Child Discipline
Commissioner you could very well be sucking off other kids.
That's not
something that an Assessment Officer can include in a Child Consequence
Order. Or a Consequence Officer like me can impose for
failing to
cooperate or for any defiance, resistance, or bad language during the
process.
But a Commissioner certainly can include it in a Child
Discipline
Order. I'm warning you now, that if you're caught
masturbating without
permission, don't cum when ordered to masturbate, refuse to masturbate,
or
don't announce your cums, you'll find yourself in front of a
Commissioner as we'll
consider any of those things, as well as not complying with the terms
of your
Consequence order as evidence of a serious lack of self discipline on
your
part."
"But suppose I can't cum anymore that day because all those people
playing
with my dick caused me to have too many cums."
"That's too bad; if it you don't cum when ordered, it's a trip to a
CDAC
for a level 4 spanking including 4 genital strap hits, 8 anal strap
hits, 7
cane strokes, and an appearance before a Discipline Commissioner who
likely
will put you on Puermax."
Thomas blanched at this news. He recalled from his lessons at
school that
a Commissioner for non-delinquent behavior could make him be naked for
between
20 and 60 days, plus if at the end of that period the Commissioner
decided that
he still hadn't acquired enough self discipline to do what was expected
of him
when expected, he or she could add more days in whatever increment the
Commissioner thought was needed. And after that, if
necessary, the
Commissioner could continue to add on day increments until the
Commissioner
decided the child developed sufficient self discipline.
Thomas remembered
from school that the maximum nudity period was 5 months, but could be
extended
up to 9 months for delinquent acts that would be felonies if done by
adults. On top of that, a Commissioner could mandate
spankings and other
pain consequences as often and under whatever conditions deemed
appropriate for
the case, as well as public masturbation and being public property.
Fighting back tears, a suddenly runny nosed Thomas remembered that even
worse,
a Commissioner could impose sexual humiliations that included things
such as
masturbating other kids under a masturbation consequence or having oral
sex
with kids who had that included as part of their Discipline
Order. Worst
of all, the Commissioner could prescribe several medications designed
to cause
maximum embarrassment and humiliation. For an approximate 15
hour period,
Puermax would cause a boy to be fully erect around 90% of the time; the
female
version, Puellamax, caused a girl to be very noticeably aroused with an
erect
clitoris and nipples for similar periods of time. Both drugs
increased
sensitively and responsiveness to sexual stimulation; some children had
been
known to occasionally reach orgasm simply by a strong breeze or by
vigorous
physical activity. The two drugs also increased the number of
orgasms a
child could achieve in a day and noticeably lessened the interval
needed
between orgasms, with the most dramatic effect being among ejaculatory
pubertal
children,
"She's being awfully rough on him," Santa commented to a passing CDAC
official who had also stopped to listen in to the session.
"Normally," replied the official, "for the minor nature and
brevity of Tommy's outbursts and language, we would only give a warning
of
consequences that will occur if the behavior persists. But,
in the first
4 months or so a CDAC operates, we want to send a strong message to the
children that we will not tolerate uncooperativeness, defiance,
disrespect,
resistance, bad language, and the like. That's why she's in
effect
throwing the book at Tommy by imposing every additional consequence she
can, at
the highest level she can."
"Thank you for explaining that," Santa thanked the official.
"You're welcome," replied the official.
"I suppose," mused Santa, "that one of the reasons you ease off
after a few months is to not contribute to having too many kids nude at
one
time."
"Precisely the reason," responded the official. "If too
few kids are naked at any one time, the program jeopardizes public
acceptance
of disciplinary nudity as being the standard. It also loses its
deterrent value
since the youngsters will perceive public nudity as being a very
unlikely
consequence for their misbehavior."
"That makes sense to me," said Santa.
"Similarly, too many kids naked at one time is
counterproductive.
The kids will perceive it as the new normal and that no matter what
they do,
good or bad, more days than not they're going to be naked, embarrassed,
humiliated and spanked. Under those circumstances, the kids
won't see
avoiding public nudity and the other CDAC consequences as a deterrent
to
misbehavior and undisciplined actions."
"So, is there a magic number as to ideally how many should be naked
each
day?" inquired Santa.
"Research suggests that there is a range that likely will be the most
effective," replied the official. "Here, let me look it up on
my tablet. Ah, there it is. Current target for the
primary CDAC
audience of ages 10 to 17 is 5% each day with percentages varying by
age. When
we add younger and older children to the mix the overall percentage
drops to
3.7% of children. The precise percentage by age is in a table
on the
training and technical site. The range is from 1% for the
very youngest
and oldest children all the way to 7% for 13 year olds with the other
ages
between those limits. Here, I'll pull it up for you."
Glancing at the table, Santa said, "I see that there's a big increase
in
the middle school ages, both in numbers nude and in girls nude."
"Yes, that middle school junior high age group tends to be the most
problematic for inappropriate behavior. We especially see a
dramatic
increase in defiance, disrespect and bullying. As to girls, at that age
they
actually engage in those three behaviors more than boys, but boys still
slightly outnumber them for CDAC consequences because of the other
mischief
they tend to get into, especially not doing homework timely, putting
off doing
chores, unacceptable unsafe risk taking and delinquent behaviors such
as
shoplifting, vandalism and simple assault and battery."
"It's interesting that at the lower and upper ages the number of girls
are
much less than the boys."
"For the very youngest ages, up to 7 or 8," explained the official,
"girls do tend to behave better than boys; parents and schools are also
less inclined to refer than to a CDAC for less than serious offenses.
For
slightly older girls, up to 10 or 11, they still generally behave
better than
boys, but to a lesser degree than the younger ones. Then, we
see that
middle school-junior high spike, followed by an increasing decline with
the
oldest girls starting around age 16 very much demonstrating the
phenomenon of
'girls mature faster than boys' being very much in play."
With the official's explanation complete, Santa turned his attention
back to
the interplay between Thomas and the Consequence Officer.
"Do be aware Tommy," the Officer continued educating her charge,
"if you go back to the Commissioner a second time, if not already on
it,
you're likely to be put on Pubregress." Upon hearing this,
Thomas'
red face instantly went bleached white. Pubregress was the
most dreaded
of the three disciplinary pharmaceuticals. Within 4 to 8 days
of starting
the drug, and for most within 5 or 6 days, kids' genitals and breasts
would
literally regress to either early Tanner Sexual Maturity Rating stage 2
or much
more commonly stage 1. By increasing dosage, not yet
fully stage 5
kids and adults up to age 22 or so could also be reduced to stage
1.
It's more mild companion drug intended only for stage 1 and 2 kids,
disciplinary Pubertol, depending on dose regressed kids ½ to
1
stage. Once fully regressed, both drugs kept the child at the
regressed
stage until the medication was mandatorily discontinued upon expiration
of the
Discipline Order that prescribed its use. Adding to the
embarrassment and
humiliation for kids who before regression had progressed enough to be
able to
ejaculate was the not so small matter that any stage 1 and almost all
stage 2
children, regressed or not, only had dry orgasms.
"Oh, before I forget Tommy, for the record I need to know if when you
cum,
you shoot or if you're still dry, " inquired the Consequence Officer of
the once more blushing Thomas.
"I'm, I'm dry," a barely audible and very embarrassed Thomas replied.
"Okay then, it's on to the display area for your 50 minutes
pre-spanking
time and then the Painatorium for the spanking machine. Your
family, some
friends, and a large audience are already waiting to cheer you on;
they've
waited way too long for you, so let's get this show on the
road. By the
way, because you're now at level 5, both your before and after spanking
display
times is 50 minutes each instead of the 30 minutes for level3 or the 40
minutes
for level 4. Once your post spanking display is done, you need to be
fitted for
your nanotech bands so you don't freeze in cold weather and the
nanotech sensor
that signals you're having an orgasm and not faking."
As he hurried on to his meeting, Santa recalled some of the events of
the past
few months that led up to the scene he had just witnessed.
*
Eight Months Prior to Last Christmas
"This is terrible, very, very terrible," said a
very, very
angry Santa, loudly slapping his hands onto the desk, "absolutely
positively terrible!"
"Calm down, dear," Mrs. Claus attempted to soothe her extremely
agitated husband, "it can't possibly be that terrible."
"Yes it is!" snapped back Santa, "even worse than when my
predecessor started our Santa's Spank Shops some decades ago!"
"What, exactly is the problem then?" inquired Mrs. Claus, mostly for
the benefit of the others in the meeting room; she already knew as she
and her
husband had been regularly discussing the issue for the past year,
especially
in the past few months.
"This is!" exploded Santa, violently slamming the "Who's Been
Good" and "Who's Been Naughty" lists onto his desk.
"Way too many naughty children these days, too many bullies, too much
defiance, too frequent disrespect! Unacceptable levels of disobedience
and
disregard of laws and rules! Naughtiness is running rampant!
We, society
as a whole, the authorities, and the little brats' parents need to fix
it and
take back control. Now!"
Everyone in the meeting room except one recoiled in horror at the
venomous
vehemence of the usually Jolly Old One's response. Mrs. Claus, all
fourteen elf
Executive Vice Presidents, and Santa's human executive assistant Nancy
could
not recall a time when the Chief Executive Officer and President of
North Pole
Enterprises was more upset than he was now. Four of five of Santa's
special
invited human guests, two men and two woman from variously recently
formed
national and multi-national child discipline assistance
administrations, didn't
know what to make of it; in Santa's visits to them and selected
colleagues over
the last two months he had been very pleasant as they with utmost
secrecy
planned solutions to the current dismal child misbehavior naughty list
situation that had Santa so agitated. Santa's fifth guest
smiled broadly;
this was going exactly as she and her new boss had planned.
Calming down somewhat, very much a necessity with his high blood
pressure
problems for which he was currently taking three separate prescription
medications, he sometimes known as Kris Kringle pointed to the naughty
list. "It didn't take many years after we started Santa's
Spank
Shops for that list to grow smaller than the good list. But, look at it
now."
Everyone could see the naughty list was at least three times thicker
than the
good list.
"Yes, Santa," replied the EVP Child Behavior Classification, the
department in charge of the good and naughty lists, "over some years
now,
the naughty list has been getting larger and larger than the good
list.
But you have to take in account that at your direction we've been
steadily
tightening up and narrowing down our criteria of what constitutes good
behavior."
"That doesn't explain it," responded the EVP Finance.
"Within years of our starting the Santa's Spank Shops operation, our
overall revenues more than doubled and profits more than
tripled. But now
they've been in an unsustainable seven year decline that may force us
to cut
back operations."
"Exactly," chimed in the always one to chime in EVP Planning,
Research and Development, "if more behavior is now classified as
naughty
than before, sales and use of Spank Shop products, and therefore our
profits,
should have increased significantly, not precariously declined."
"You've nailed it," Santa praised his EVP Planning, Research and
Development, all theatricals now abandoned in favor of conducting
productive
practical business.
"We need a plan," stated the EVP Operations, being one to always
state the obvious.
"And we have it," Santa simply said. "Over the past few
months I've been working with these five nice people to formulate a
viable
solution, which we now have and will be implementing immediately."
Every EVP and Nancy broke out in broad grins; leave it to the boss to
have an
answer to the problem. An answer that surely meant their jobs
and the
jobs of their people, both elf and human, were once more safe for the
foreseeable future.
"Now, everyone," Santa addressed his senior executive staff,
"it's time to meet our new partners in success."
First to be introduced was the Deputy Director of the United States
Child
Discipline Assistance and Enforcement Administration. He was followed
from the
European Union by the Assistant Director of the European Child
Discipline
Agency. Following her, speaking fluent English, the Undersecretary of
the Union
of South American Nations Child Discipline Council introduced
himself.
After her own introduction, the High Commissioner of the Commonwealth
Nations
and Crown Dependencies Child Discipline Assistance and Enforcement
Commission
said as previously coached, "and now, I believe Santa has someone very
special to introduce."
"Yes, indeed," Santa agreeably agreed. "I now have the distinct
pleasure to present to you our newly appointed Executive Vice President
Child
Discipline Operations, Mrs. Deanna Caine. To facilitate liaison with
the
various child discipline agencies worldwide, Dee will mostly work out
of an
office in suburban Washington, DC with a mostly human
staff. But
she, very often accompanied by her husband and two mostly but not
always well
behaved children, will also periodically be spending time here at North
Pole
Enterprises."
Many EVP's visibly frowned or audibly groaned at this unprecedented
major break
with tradition. No human had ever been appointed an Executive
Vice
President. Executives and managers yes; EVP's, never, ever.
"Makes sense to me," eagerly said the EVP Filmed and Electronic
Media, always eager to defend a fellow female regardless of species.
Besides,
her second in command was a very competent human woman who was a genius
at
getting excellent realistic performances, especially from the children
and
teens appearing in the Santa's Spank Shops line of
productions. "Who
better to head a department involving the disciplining of human
children than a
human?"
"My thoughts exactly," jovially replied Santa, effectively pulling
the plug on the brewing dissent before it could brew. "Now,
let's
get down to business, shall we?"
By consent of all, the Deputy Director from the United States served as
chair
of the ensuing work session.
"Before we start," he started, "there are several important
points that need to be realized by all here. First, the new Child
Discipline
Initiative and the Child Discipline Assistance Centers in all the
jurisdictions
the various agencies here serve have been operational for less than six
months.
And the centers in many areas of our jurisdictions are still under
construction
and not yet operational. Undoubtedly both of these factors
are big
reasons why your naughty list has yet shown a decline in numbers."
"We in England were first to open a center," stated the High
Commissioner in typical stereotypical British understated fashion.
"By four days," the Deputy Director felt compelled to defend his
country's honor.
"I'm a little confused," said the EVP Security and Public Safety,
partly out of confusion and partly to diffuse any positional bickering
among
the humans. "Isn't the United Kingdom a member of the
European
Union, not the Commonwealth of Nations?
"Actually," replied the Assistant Director from the European agency,
"it's a member of both. All parties concerned agreed that for
cultural, historical, societal, and administrative reasons it made the
most
sense for the UK to be under the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth
commission."
"But," objected the always weak on geography EVP Mining and Precious
Metals Operations, "the Commonwealth's High Commissioner is from
England,
not this United Kingdom you'll all talking about."
"Silly," replied Mrs. Claus, the teacher in her taking over amid the
snickering and giggling in the room, "the United Kingdom consists of
the
three nations on the island of Great Britain, which are England,
Scotland and
Wales, and additionally includes the nation of Northern Ireland and
various
small islands not including Crown Dependencies."
"Crown Dependencies?" queried the EVP Books and Publishing,
uncharacteristically displaying a lapse in her renowned vast knowledge
of many
subjects. Santa sometimes thought she would be an excellent
reference librarian.
"The Crown Dependencies," replied the High Commissioner, "are
Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man; all three have opted to be
subject to our
Commission and to operate their Child Discipline Initiatives under our
regulations."
"No doubt so they can get Commonwealth child discipline funding,"
commented the South America Undersecretary.
"Now that the geopolitical lesson is over, we need to get back to
business," smiled the affable Deputy Director.
"Yes, indeed," agreed an eager to move things along Santa.
"Next thing to realize," began the Deputy Director, "is that
with the exception of a few sites intended for training purposes and to
test
new equipment and ideas, none of the agencies here operate the
centers.
That's done at a more local level."
"Well then, what do you do?" asked the EVP Administrative Services,
being one to always look for ways to increase efficiency and reduce
unnecessary
redundancy.
"In the case of my agency, we primarily conduct research and
development,
test equipment, technology and software, publish reports and
informational
material, distribute federal funding to the various state and
territorial
administrative agencies, issue manuals of protocols and procedures that
agencies receiving federal funds must adhere to, and conduct compliance
inspections of facilities receiving federal funding. The other
administrative
agencies here operate in very much a similar fashion."
"If you don't, who does operate the centers?" inquired the always
interested in organizational details EVP Logistics.
"In the United States, each state and territory receiving federal child
discipline funding, which currently is all of them, operate a state
level
administrative agency responsible for receiving and distributing
federal
funding, ensuring compliance with our and their standards, and
providing
support to the regional and local operational agencies, if any, within
their
boundaries," continued the Deputy. "In some states and most
territories, especially the geographically smaller ones, that
administrative
agency also operate the centers. In others, especially larger ones,
multi-jurisdictional regional agencies under supervision of the state
agency
perform many of the same duties as the statewide agency. In some states
and
larger territories, the regional agency also operates the
centers. In
others, these regional agencies are purely administrative and
supervisory with
the centers operated by a local agency; typically these local agencies
operate
within the same boundaries as the judicial district in which they're
located."
"This can get confusing," muttered the often confused head in the
clouds EVP Computing, Technology and Telecommunications.
"It's all explained in the information packets you received when you
entered the room," replied the Deputy Director. "Now, to
explain the philosophy behind what is now known as the Child Discipline
Initiative and practical operational matters, I'll turn the meeting
over to my
good friend the High Commissioner. It was the Commonwealth,
and the
European Union, that was primarily responsible for the research that
triggered
the worldwide implementation of the Initiative."
"It has long been thought, now substantiated by solid research,"
began the High Commissioner, "that all child misbehavior stems from a
lapse
of self discipline on the child's part. Punishment for such
behavior has
traditionally been seen as a means of correcting these lapses of
discipline."
"So, that's why punishment is referred to as disciplining," astutely
commented the always astute EVP Acquisitions and Partnerships, somehow
hiding
his annoyance that the human Mrs. Caine rather than his department
would be the
North Pole's liaison with the various national and multi-national child
discipline agencies.
"Precisely," precisely replied the High Commissioner in her precise
refined upper class English accent. "Additionally, current
research
strongly supports the now centuries old supposition that repeated
failure to do
what is expected and required by society, community, family and school
or not
doing what is necessary to succeed at personal goals such as athletic,
artistic
or academic excellence is due to a persistent lack of self
discipline.
The Child Discipline Initiative through its Child Discipline Assistance
Centers
is designed and intended to address both types of disciplinary failure
on the
child's part. That is, we strive to correct temporary lapses
of
discipline as evidenced by misbehavior and inappropriate actions by
imposing
short term Child Consequence Orders and to alleviate a persistent
demonstration
of lack of self discipline through the use of longer term Child
Discipline
Orders. Greater detail is provided in your informational packets."
"But," asked the solidly soft hearted EVP Elf and Human Resources,
"why not just use widely accepted punishments, like groundings, extra
chores and loss of allowance?"
"Because," patiently explained the affable High Commissioner,
"the current research clearly shows that a combination of Humiliation,
Embarrassment, and Pain is the most effective methodology for
correcting both
lapses and lack of self discipline. When properly applied
using certain
specific procedures and guidelines, the HEP model can be successfully
implemented and utilized without any resultant long term negative
outcomes that
the previous somewhat faulty research attributed to such methods."
"The research is now consistently validating the findings that HEP is
the
most effective discipline technique and can be imposed in such a way as
to not
cause unintended undesirable short and long term results," newly
appointed
EVP Child Discipline Operations Dee Caine added to the discussion.
"Mrs. Caine, why the particular humiliation, embarrassment and pain
techniques you all use?" inquired the EVP Acquisitions and
Partnerships,
determined to make the Caine woman and the Child Discipline Initiative
that was
her bailiwick look as bad as possible.
"Again, that's what the research verifies as being the most
effective," replied the clearly confident and noticeably not the least
intimidated Dee. "The combination of public nudity for embarrassment,
public sexual acts for humiliation, and various types of public naked
spankings
for pain stood out as heads and shoulders above any other combination.
The
studies also strongly support, in appropriate cases where additional
consequences are needed, the use of certain supplemental pain inducing
techniques such as dildos specifically designed to cause persistent
pain and
hot seats that heat to just a few degrees below a burn inducing
temperature."
"Another aspect of the Humiliation and Embarrassment protocols allows,
when deemed useful by a Discipline Commissioner, requiring the child to
participate in community service projects, performances or competitions
designed specifically to take advantage of the child's nudity and
sexual
consequences," the High Commissioner resumed her presenter role.
"I have a question," timidly stated the generally timid EVP Special
Projects. "Other than the spankings, how effective is this going to be
with the younger children who don't yet have a strong sense of modesty."
"I'll tackle that," volunteered the Assistant Director of the
European Child Discipline Agency, "since that's an area of research the
EU
is heavily involved with. It's true that children up to the
age of 8 or
so don't have a strong sense of modesty surrounding nudity or an
inherent
strong sense of shame concerning public sexual behaviors. Modesty
starts to
straighten sometime between ages 8 to 10 or a little older, and is
usually
strongly embedded by age 12 or 13; precise age for these various stages
does
vary by child."
"So, than," the Special Projects EVP persisted, "how does the H
& E portion of the HEP model apply to them?"
"For the least modest children," the Assistant Director explained,
"embarrassment primarily comes from their realization that anyone
seeing
them naked in a normally inappropriate or uncommon setting will know
that
they're under a consequence or discipline order. Humiliation is
primarily the
shame they feel at knowing that they're being made to do things in
public, such
as masturbation, that they were taught only to do in private or not to
do at
all. We can enhance that embarrassment and induce a higher
level of
humiliating shame in this group by constantly reminding and reinforcing
at
home, at school, in the community, and in the media that only children
under
consequence and discipline orders are naked and doing sexual things in
public
places where others don't normally go nude and do those things. For the
somewhat more modest, it's a combination of the same factors as the
less modest
and like with the more strongly modest, simply being naked in public
and doing
normally very personal and private activities in front of
others. For the
most modest, it's simply primarily being naked in public and doing
private
sexual behavior in full view of an audience. Again, we strongly rely
and
encourage our media partners to reinforce and encourage for the reasons
I just
noted children's inherent embarrassment and humiliation reactions to
being
naked and performing sexually in front of others."
"Speaking of media," the Deputy Director of the United States Child
Discipline Assistance and Enforcement Administration resumed his duties
as
chair of the meeting, "you've all probably noticed that the media now
routinely include uncensored depictions of children under CDAC
orders.
This is part of a carefully orchestrated plan intended to acclimate the
public
to the initiative and gain their acceptance of the techniques involved."
"My eleven year old son Samuel and nine year old daughter Kelly,"
injected EVP Deana Caine, "eagerly look forward to those movies and
episodes of their favorite programs where one or more children are
sporting red
behinds and displaying all they have, sometimes in an aroused state and
occasionally in a sexual situation culminating in orgasm. I
understand
the standard practice is not to fake the sexual behaviors and orgasms
and at
the request of a parent or studio teacher, for good cause, the
spankings and
other pain techniques can be real instead of simulated. I use
these films
and programs, as do many of my neighbors for their own children, to
emphasize
to Sammy and Kelly that if they don't behave and tow the straight and
narrow
what they're seeing on the screen will very likely be happening to
them, in
public."
"Thank you Dee," the Deputy Director thanked Dee Caine. "At
first these depictions were in children's cartoons, starting with nudity
and
spankings. When the cartoons expanded to sexual masturbatory
consequences, nudity started appearing on live filmed children's
programs,
followed by spankings and then sexual situations involving
masturbation.
When spankings started on the live children's shows, child
consequential nudity
began appearing in regular programming. When the kids' shows
advanced to
depictions of masturbation, spankings commenced on regular television
programming and child nudity appeared in films."
"What about live theatre?" the EVP Theatrical Productions inquired.
"I've heard a musical called Willy's Willy is
coming to Broadway
and that it will depict every possible consequence that a child can be
made to
undergo."
"That is correct," confirmed the Deputy Directory. "But, to
continue with the sequence of events, fictional child consequential and
then
disciplinary nudity spread to some appropriate live theatrical
productions.
Then spankings and eventually masturbation were depicted on
some episodes
of regular programs, with films shortly thereafter following the same
order of
spankings first than masturbation. When regular programming
commenced
with disciplinary masturbation, select live productions incorporated
mostly
simulated spanking scenes, with stage effects mimicking the sounds of a
real
spanking and prop soft non-stinging spanking implements rigged to apply
a
special reagent chemical that harmlessly and painlessly turns the young
performer's bare bottom to any desired combination of any shade of
pink, red,
crimson, or purple and any size and number of artificial bruises and
welts. Of
course, as in the television programs and the movies, upon request of a
parent,
specified staff, or teacher, a real spanking can be substituted."
"I guess," ventured the EVP Theatrical Productions, "that
producers, live and filmed, are afraid to depict more than they already
do."
"Not the case," responded the Deputy Director. "At our
request, films and television now occasionally include oral sex
consequences
and depict the various supplemental pain methods. Directors
and producers
seem particularly fond when appropriate for the scenario, of using the
punishment dildos on their young performers; while that can be faked
using a
collapsible foam dildo, sometimes it isn't so the pain is real and
clearly
registers on screen. A few live productions now also include
a scene or
two with the youngster masturbating or being masturbated to orgasm."
"Why are the productions willing to include all of this in their
shows?" asked the EVP Research and Development.
"Believe it or not, it's good for ratings and ticket sales," answered
the Deputy Director. "And all the agencies here provide
generous
financial incentives for the producers to do so. We carefully
control the
frequency, length, and types of consequences depicted. As we
add
consequences and length of time, especially for nudity and sexual
humiliations,
the incentives increase. We're now at a point where on some,
but far from
all, television programs, especially children's shows, in every episode
one or
more children are nude for every scene they're in; sometimes with a
substantial
number of scenes. Films, and now live theatre, are moving
toward this
also. I'm aware of one all age film and two children's films
now in
production where several children in each film will have extensive
screen time
nude. In one of the children's films, about a group of
unintentionally
mischievous neighborhood kids, every child in the cast will be nude and
under a
CDAC consequence or discipline order for the entire film; they have no
clothed
scenes at all and each individual child is in at least 65% of scenes,
some in
as many as 90%."
"Won't all this nudity undermine its effectiveness as a discipline
tool?" inquired Santa, eager to have this new initiative to be as
effective as possible.
"No," reassured the Deputy Director, "because under our
contracts with the producers we control the number of episodes, films
and live
performances depicting consequences and the type, frequency,
and
length of those depictions in any particular episode, film or
live
show."
"So, what about this Willy's Willy show?" pressed
the EVP
Theatrical Productions, his professional interest creating a pressing
need to
know all the nuts and bolts of this upcoming production in which all
the
children were surely to be up and coming.
"Willy's Willy is intended as the biggest, finest
and most
comprehensive element of the acclimation and acceptance campaign." The
Deputy Director proudly pronounced. "My agency is a
co-producer
providing significant funding. In addition to the 12 adult
cast members
including swings, there are 20 boys and 14 girls in the cast, ranging
from ages
6 to 16. At any given performance there are 9 adults, 8 boys,
and 6 girls
performing. The boy playing the lead, 10 year old Willy, is
in all but 2
scenes; the boy playing his best friend, 11 year old Nicholas, is in
all but 4
scenes. Both boys are nude for the entire show, start to
final bow. I
hear that all 4 boys sharing the role of Willy and the 3 boys playing
Nicholas
all plan to stay in character after the show by appearing at the stage
door to
sign autographs and greet the fans while still naked. Of
course, in
colder weather they'll wear the appropriate nanotech bands to stay warm
while
so exposed. Rumor has it that many of the other kids
including many on
standby that performance, but not all, plan to do the same.
All the other
kids who perform at a given show are on stage nude at least 40% of the
time,
with most 60% to 70% of the show. Two boys, a 14 year old and an 8 year
old,
and one girl, Willy's 11 year old neighbor, are nude on stage for 85%
of the
show. Also, depending on character, when nude the children
will be in a
state of either intended or inadvertent sexual arousal form 30% to 40%
of the
show. For Willy, Nicholas and the 14 year old, it's 70% of
the show. Of course,
as with any film, program, or live theatre production, parents,
teachers, stage
guardians and management can request substituting real spankings and
dildos for
the theatrical versions."
"Won't that shut the show down and get people arrested for child
pornography?"
asked the less than logical EVP Animal Operations, completely missing
that if Willy's
Willy was illegal, so would all the television programs and
films being
discussed by the Deputy Director, not to mention many Santa Spank Shops
videos
and books.
"Not at all," stated the Deputy Director. "The show, and
the other programs and films, depict legal child discipline
consequences.
By law, dating back to before you folks started your Spank Shops, the
depictions of these legal consequences, both fictional and actual, are
also
legal. The difference now is that with the Initiative, many
more
consequences are legal. And, we're particularly pleased that the
creative team
has decided to go all the way with Willy's Willy.
Any and
everything that can be imposed under either a Child Consequence Order
or Child
Discipline Order will be depicted in the show. That includes
the
supplemental pain consequences including the collapsible theatrical
dildo; the
audience won't be able to tell that it deflates as it penetrates the
child.
Willy undergoes 2 insertions, Nicholas 1, and the 14 year old
boy 3
insertions. There will be masturbation and oral sex scenes;
every child
in that performance will have at least 1orgasm on stage.
Willy is
expected to have 5, given his age, all dry; Nicholas 4, also dry; and
the 14
year old 3, all wet. The disciplinary drugs Puermax and
Puellamax will
help with the repeated arousals and orgasms. "
"A unique aspect of Willy's Willy," contributed Dee
Caine,
"is that at each performance by advance arrangement in exchange for
free
tickets for the families involved, 2 or 3, and sometimes 4 or 5,
children from
the audience will early in the show undergo a real CDAC proceeding on
stage,
complete with spankings, standard nudity times, and other appropriate
consequences."
"That show is going to be one hot ticket," exclaimed the EVP Sales
and Promotions, always on the lookout for ways to increase business and
revenue. "Maybe, we can run some promotional campaigns giving
away
tickets and the like."
"Complete with backstage tours and an onstage CDAC session," Santa
gleefully endorsed the idea of his always brilliant Sales and
Promotions EVP.
"Finally, before we break up into smaller work groups, "the Deputy
Director finalized his presentation, "I would like to point out that
child
discipline proceedings are not judicial in nature, they are purely
administrative. That's why we deliberately use child instead
of juvenile
and terms like consequences instead of sanctions or sentences. When
either police
or Child Discipline Enforcement Officers take control of a child for
transport
to a discipline center, the child is not under arrest or in custody or
considered detained, rather they're under 'disciplinary control' of the
officer
or officers."
"Why would such officers be involved in the first place?" inquired
Santa despite already knowing the answer. He wanted to ensure
that
everyone present understood the role of the police and enforcement
officers in
the new child discipline scheme.
"By law," EVP Caine undertook the explanation, "for children,
all misdemeanor criminal type behavior such as shoplifting and simple
assault
as well as status offenses involving curfew, alcohol, or tobacco are
now handed
by a Discipline Commissioner rather than a juvenile court judge or
intake
officer."
"So, what is a Child Discipline Enforcement Officer?" asked the EVP
Security and Public Safety.
"Essentially," responded the Deputy Director, "they're the
police force of the Child Discipline Initiative, but we're careful not
to refer
to them as police. Generally, they do not carry firearms or
batons; when
subduing is necessary, they use less intrusive devices such as a mild
pepper
spray or lower voltage stun gun, both certified safe for
children. The
officers provide security at CDACS, patrol the streets looking for
misbehaviors
under CDAC jurisdiction and for noncompliance with consequence or
discipline
orders. Like probation officers, they also conduct spot
checks of the
homes and schools of children under an order, especially discipline
orders and
level 5 or higher consequence orders. Similar to a police
department
school resource officer, enforcement officers are also stationed at
most
schools; they're also assigned to events attracting a large number of
children
such as festivals and youth sports tournaments. They respond to
parental and
school requests for assistance; usually these involve out of control
children
or children not cooperating with efforts to take them to a CDAC. Police
can
also respond to such requests, if they're closer to the scene or an
enforcement
officer is unavailable or is in need of assistance."
"So basically," commented the EVP Security and Public Safety,
"they're police officers without the guns."
"Exactly," confirmed the Deputy Director. "And like the
police, in any of the situations I described, enforcement officers can
place
children under disciplinary control, that is, what most people would
call
arrest. And, yes, like the police, they can handcuff the
child if
necessary to ensure safety of the child or others, prevent fleeing, or
prevent
covering up of a child's no longer private parts. When handcuffing
under those
circumstances police and enforcement officers use a special plastic
flexi-tie
cuff instead of regular metal cuffs."
"Why would there be a need to prevent covering up, wouldn't the kid
still
be dressed at that stage?" asked a very curious EVP Child Behavior
Classification.
"Policy, and law," stated the Deputy Director, "stipulate that
upon a police or enforcement officer taking a child under disciplinary
control
for reasonable cause to believe the child engaged in non-compliance
with a CDAC
order, resistance, or a delinquent act, or the child admits to behavior
under
CDAC jurisdiction, the child is required to immediately become naked,
if not
already so, and will be transported to the CDAC in that state of
undress. Other
than children already under a consequence or discipline order, these
are the
only children who arrive at a CDAC already naked. If the
child doesn't
willingly cooperate in stripping naked, either at the time of being
taken under
disciplinary control or at a CDAC after issuance of an order, his or
her
clothing can be removed by any means necessary including ripping or
cutting
off. If a child is under control for resistance or a child's
clothing has
to be forcibly removed, this is considered defiance and disrespect of
authority
resulting in a mandatory increase of 2 levels over what otherwise would
be
imposed, with the minimal level being 6 since the normal defiance and
disrespect level is 4. All the additional penalties for defiance,
disrespect,
bullying and delinquent behavior apply. That includes in addition to
the normal
number of martinet spanks for the assigned disciplinary level, cane
strokes
equal to 3 more than the assigned level, anal strap spanks twice the
assigned
level, genital strap spanks equal to the disciplinary level, forced
public
masturbation, being made community public, and nudity days increased to
twice
the assigned discipline level plus the day taken under control.
Additionally,
children under a Discipline Order for resistance to being taken to a
CDAC or
being made naked either before or after an order has been issued must
be put on
the disciplinary drug required to regress their sexual development to
stage
1. The idea is to discourage resistance to being taken to a
CDAC by a
parent, school official, police or enforcement officer and to
discourage not
cooperating with mandatory nudity."
"What about other children," inquired the EVP Security and Public
Safety, "can they also be put on Pubregress or Pubertrol?"
"Any child under a Discipline Order for bullying must be put on the
appropriate drug to regress to stage 1," replied the Deputy
Director. "For children under a Discipline Order other than
for
bullying, resistance, or not cooperating with mandatory nudity,
Commissioners
have the discretion, if they deem appropriate for the case, to require
regression drugs subject established policies and protocols."
*
Three Months after Last Christmas
"Our next hiney to be spanked belongs to Tommy
Milano, age 14,
discipline age 12," blared from loudspeakers as Santa entered
Painatorium
2, one of four Painatoriums at the North Pole CDAC. His meeting had
went well,
ending in little more than an hour; Tommy's appointment with the
spanking
machine had been delayed 20 minutes due to a backlog caused by several
uncooperative children, all who, like Tommy, received on the spot
additional
consequences.
As the blushing naked Tommy was brought on stage, the audience in the
packed
Painatorium applauded loudly. It still amazed Santa had well
Painatoriums
worldwide were attended; it had been explained to him that
for a cost
about the same as for a movie ticket, people, and especially
their
children, loved seeing misbehaving children receive their just deserts
live on
stage. Many parents and schools used regular outings to local
Painatoriums at nearby CDACs as a very visual and vivid method of
reminding and
impressing upon the children under their care the consequences they
would face
for misbehavior.
"Tommy is under a Child Consequence Order at level 5 for defiance,
disrespect and bullying." At the mention of bullying, cheering and loud
applause again erupted, mostly from the children in the audience. This
reaction
did not surprise Santa as it routinely occurred when a bully was
announced; he
had previously been advised that children, including teens, were very
spirited
and exuberant at witnessing bullies being severely punished.
Quickly, the two Child Consequence Officers had Tommy secured in
position on
the spanking bed, similar in design to a physician's examination
table.
He was situated face up with his feet secured in widely spaced stirrups
positioned high enough to force his bare bottom completely up in the
air and
off the table mat. A wide strap secured his arms and chest a
few inches
below his nipples to the mat. This position left his spread
wide apart
bottom facing the audience, with his anus and genitals clearly
visible.
Santa knew that this position was adopted as the worldwide CDAC
standard
because of the high level of embarrassment, humiliation and sense of
vulnerability caused the child and the easy accessibility to those
areas to be
chastised.
Above the table, a very large high definition monitor lit up; the left
third
showing a close up of the hapless boy's face, the other two-thirds
displaying a
close up of his exposed bottom and genitals. Below the
monitor, a digital
countdown display listed Tommy's assigned spanking methods: 50 buttocks
martinet
spanks, 5 martinet anal spanks, 5 martinet genital spanks, 10 anal
strap
spanks, 5 genital strap spanks, and 8 cane strokes.
Without warning, the first martinet spank impacted Tommy's bare behind,
eliciting an immediate loud yelp. That first spank had been
much more
painful than he had anticipated; he couldn't comprehend how he would be
able to
take his entire spanking. Unbeknownst to Tommy, the machine was only
striking
him with 45% of the force it was capable of producing. Force
was determined,
in 5% increments, by the child's discipline age; if Tommy had been
assigned age
10 the force would had been 35%, similarly, if he'd been at age 14 it
would be
set to 55%.
By the ninth stroke of the martinet, with his first anal and genital
martinet
spanks delivered, Tommy was loudly crying, tears freely running down
his
face. When the first snap of the anal strap struck directly
onto his
gaping open anus, his sobbing rose to a new crescendo. By the
time his
first genital strap blow and first 2 cane strokes were completed, he
was wildly
wailing so discordantly that some in the audience were inclined to
believe that
surely a pack of berserk banshees were running rampart in the
building.
Small children were covering their ears to lessen the shrill piercing
noises
emanating from Tommy's mouth.
When the spanking was complete, the barely able to stand Tommy was led
off the
stage, his badly ravished bottom and genitals on display for
all. His
bottom was a deep crimson, even purple in a few spots, with some
multicolored
bruises and some blisters. The telltale cane tracks, now
raised and a
very angry and sore looking red, were very evident on the boy's
multicolored
bottom. As was customary for 7 or more cane strokes, the last
two were
delivered as opposing diagonals, with the two lines intersecting
directly over
Tommy's very red and raw looking anus. His genitals, penis
and scrotum
both, were a very bright sore red and to Santa's eye, slightly swollen.
As the next child was announced, Santa exited the Painatorium for the
display
area. This area, like the Painatorium, was packed with
people, especially
gleeful children freely fondling all the young miscreants on
display. By
policy and law, all children on display, even if not community
property, could
be touched and handled by anyone in attendance, including those who
ordinarily
couldn't touch community property children. Primary purpose
of this was
to reinforce to on display children not community property how much
worse they
could have it if they continued to engage in inappropriate behaviors or
failed
to develop self discipline. Only those who had purchased
Painatorium
tickets were admissible to the display area; Santa knew from his
briefings that
some people actually bought tickets mostly to be able to be in the
display area
as this gave than access to many more naked children than they would
encounter
at one time in public, and at a very close range with free rein to
touch and
molest as they pleased within the limits of the law.
As he entered the area, Santa was startled to see Dee Caine being
accompanied
by the very naked Sammy and Kelly as well as two also naked young
teens.
Completing the group approaching him were Dee's husband Charles, two
other
adults, and a fully dressed boy around Sammy's age.
"Santa," Dee greeted her boss, "may I introduce you to my sister
Megan and brother-in-law Michael and their three children.
The two naked
ones are 14 year old Austin and 12 year old Debra. The
dressed little
cutie is 10 year old Zachary, the only one of the five kids not to be
in
trouble. Of course you already know Sammy and Kelly."
"Nice to meet you five," Santa greeted Dee's relatives, shaking the
hands of the two adults and the thrilled Zachary. Austin and
Debra who
greeted in the now standard manner for those permitted to touch
children
undergoing disciplinary nudity; Austin by shaking 7 times the boy's
somewhat
larger than average size for his age penis topped by a generous patch
of pubic
hair and Debra by also 7 times using one hand to rub up and down her
just
beginning to sprout hair vulva and the other to rub her small
breasts.
Based on the size of his hanging scrotum and apparent testicle size,
Santa
estimated Austin to be at early Tanner Sexual Maturity Rating Stage
4.
Debra's breast size put her solidly into the middle of stage 2.
"Nice to meet you, too, sir," both now profusely blushing teens in
turn muttered back to Santa; their blushing deepened by both being in a
noticeable state of sexual arousal thanks to the Christmas Legend's
manipulation
of their body.
"Thank you, Santa," Megan said, "looks like your touch triggered
the Puermax Austin's on and the Puellamax that Debra is on."
"You're welcome," replied the always polite Santa as he reached out
to greet 11 year old Sammy in similar fashion to Austin. After eight
vigorous
shakes, the small penis of the early stage 2 Sammy was pointing
straight up and
visibly throbbing. Not wishing to ignore Kelly, Santa greeted
her as he
had Debra, causing the 9 year old to show very erect nipples and an
equally
erect and very visible clitoris.
"Dee," Santa addressed his Executive Vice President Child Discipline
Operations, "last I saw you was at our briefing today, and now here you
less than an hour later with an entire entourage of naked kids,
including your
own two."
"Exactly the way I was expecting to find them after the meeting,"
replied Dee. "Prior to coming up on the early evening
Washington-North Pole shuttle yesterday, we've arranged for these four
now
naked miscreants to see a Discipline Commissioner today."
"Your shuttle is fast," the still excited Zachary interrupted the
conversation, "it took less time than it takes us to fly to Orlando
every
year."
"Zach," scolded his mother, "it's not polite to interrupt
others, apologize to Santa and Aunt Dee right now."
"Sorry I interrupted," the apologetic crestfallen boy apologized.
"Do I have to go to the CDAC now?"
"Apology accepted, and no you don't," Both Santa and Dee
simultaneously reassured the boy.
"Zach," the smiling Santa finished his acceptance first, "you
are correct our shuttles are faster than airplanes, thanks to a little
North
Pole magic."
"I knew it," exclaimed the excited 10 year old, "and thank you
and Aunt Dee for not sending me to the CDAC."
"You're welcome," the always gracious Santa replied. "I
think your Aunt Dee can explain best why you're not now standing in
line
waiting to see a Child Discipline Assessment Officer for an order to
get naked
and be spanked."
"Zach, as Santa said," Dee responded to her nephew, "you're
welcome. The reason you're not being sent to the CDAC is that
they are
not intended for minor lapses such as an occasional interruption or
every once
in a long while not doing a chore on time. Now, if you did
those kinds of
things frequently, that would be another story, as it would be if you
had been
disrespectful or defiant, which you weren't."
"So, Dee," Santa nudged the conversation back on topic, "what's
the story with these four, if you don't mind my asking?"
"No sir, I don't mind at all," Dee replied, "although these four
might. But, if they do, that's too bad; after all, one of
their
consequences is supposed to be embarrassment."
"Yes, indeed it is," Santa agreed with her, more convinced than ever
that he had made the right choice to head the North Pole's Child
Discipline
Operations.
"My two," Dee continued, "got it into their heads that because
of my position that they could get away with things at school and in
the
neighborhood that other kids couldn't anymore. Not only did
they brag to
the other kids that this was so, at least several times a week they
demonstrated so in front of the other kids. Turns out, they
were
partially right as their schools as well as the local police and
enforcement
officers were hesitant to take action like they would against other
children
who behaved similarly."
"Ah, I see," said Santa, "you needed to nip this in the bud, so
to speak."
"Exactly," replied Dee. "It came to a head after I learned
that both of their schools allowed them to get away with behavior that
merited
their being sent to the school detention program being piloted by our
local
CDAC. Upon learning just how pervasive their misbehavior was,
I realized
that they needed to be placed under a discipline order rather than just
a one
off consequence order."
"I take it the Commissioner agreed," conjectured Santa.
"Yes she did," confirmed Dee. "They're each under a 30 day
Discipline order, including being community property, forced public
masturbation 4 times a day, weekly level 4 spankings starting today and
being
on Pubertrol, Puermax for Sammy and Puellamax for Kelly. Unfortunately
for
them, she agreed with me and Charlie that their behavior was
disrespectful of
our rules, so they're subject to the cane, anal strap and genital
strap."
"These two aren't subject to those three things but they are to
everything
else their cousins are," Megan began explaining the fate of her two
eldest. "Because of their greater development, they're also both on
Pubregress instead of Pubertrol."
"What caused them to need Discipline Orders?" Santa inquired of the
clearly gloating mother.
"Laziness, plain and simple," responded Megan. "They don't
want to do chores on time; only put forward the minimal effort to
obtain
passing marks on school assignments and projects instead of the much
better
grades they're capable of achieving; always put things off to the last
minute;
and are reluctant to put in the practice and effort to be the best they
can in
their favorite activities."
"Which for Austin," Michael entered the discussion concerning
his children, "is baseball and acting and for Debra, cheerleading."
"For all four of these nudies, sounds like classic cases of what
Discipline Orders are intended to correct," commented Santa.
"Our thoughts exactly," Dee affirmed both families thinking.
Glancing over at her youngest nephew, she instantly realized Zachary
wanted to
speak but was hesitant to do so after his recent scolding for
interrupting.
"Zach," she smiled at the boy, "it's perfectly okay to join the
conversation
provided you don't interrupt others discussing something between
themselves. You wouldn't be interrupting if you wanted to say
something
now."
"I think it's going to be neat to see who ends up with the smaller dick
and balls, Sammy or Austin," Zach stated his profound interest in the
effect the regression drugs would have on his brother and his cousin.
"Zachary," his mother again scolded him, "how many times have I
told you to use the proper words like penis and scrotum for private
parts instead
of slang words?"
"It's quite all right, Megan," Dee defended her nephew.
"When kids are under a Consequence or Discipline Order the standard
policy
and rule is that their now no longer private parts are referred to by
the
common slang words as are girls' breasts. So it's completely sociably
to call
those items by words like dick, cock, prick, balls, pussy, tits and
boobs. Even childish euphemisms for the penis like willy and
birdie and
for the vulva like kitty are encouraged for their embarrassment
potential."
Zachary couldn't help but giggle at his Aunt's use of so many forbidden
to him
words.
"Sorry, Zach," Mother apologized to son, "I was wrong. For any
child under an order, you can use any of the kind of words Aunt Dee
mentioned."
"As to who will be smaller," Dee undertook to answer Zachary's
question, "that's hard to say. Both are going back to stage
1; the
same stage you are, at least the last time I saw you naked, which was
last
summer when I had to spank you."
"I still am," admitted the slightly embarrassed Zachary.
"So does that mean they're end up being no bigger than me?"
"They might be a little bigger, about the same size, or more likely
smaller than you," Dee endeavored to reassure the ten year
old.
"As I remember, your penis is the same size as Sammy's was at your age
and
still is and his scrotum, excuse me, his balls, were about the same
size as
yours when I saw yours last year. And, if I remember rightly,
at your age
Austin was also about the same size as you and Sammy."
"So, they'll be about the same as me down there?" Sammy sought
clarification.
"As I said," Dee clarified for the confused boy, "probably
smaller. Pubertrol tends to make a boy's genitals and a
girl's breasts
about 5% smaller than the last time they were at that stage.
Pubregress
make than about 10% smaller than the last time. As far as
girl's vulva
and vagina goes, they'll look much like they did when they were last at
the
regressed stage but likely slightly less puffy and wide. Top
to bottom,
they'll be almost as long as before regression since the girl will
likely be
taller than she was when last at that stage."
"Taller?" asked Zach. "The drugs aren't supposed to make you
grow, are they?"
"No, they aren't," agreed his Aunt Dee. "But they only make you
slightly smaller in height and weight than you were before taking
them.
Pubertrol tends to make a kid 1 to 2% smaller in height and weight than
right
before being put on the drug and Pubregress a 2% to 3%
reduction.
"You said since last time," Sammy picked up on something else his
Aunt had said. "Does that mean that if they mess up again and
are
put back on the drugs their stuff will end up even smaller than they
will this
time? And will they be even shorter?"
"Yes to the first question about genital and breast size, and no to the
second about height," his smiling Aunt replied. "Once off the
drug, the child's height and genital growth, and for girls, breast
growth is
about twice as fast as when he or she originally went from their
current size
to the size they were at immediately before regression. This
double
growth rate continues until reaching the size they would have been at
for their
current age if they hadn't been regressed.
Sammy giggled, having a silly thought. "That means, if
regressed
enough times their dicks and balls would disappear and who knows what
would
happen to girls' boobies."
"Well dicks and balls wouldn't disappear," laughed his Aunt,
"they would only get very tiny. But it would take an awful
lot of
regressions to do that, many more than any one kid would likely
receive.
If a boy on Pubregress for the first time regressed to a stage 1 penis
that
produced a 1-1/2 inch erection it would take 10 or 11 regressions to
reduce his
hard on to an half inch. If a boy's regressed
non-erect penis
was 1 inch long, it would take 6 or 7 regressions for it to be only a
half
inch. No matter how many regressions, his genitals wouldn't
disappear;
they would only get smaller and smaller to the point after many
regressions you'd
need a microscope or strong magnifying glass to see them. As to girls'
breasts,
at stage 1 they don't have any and you can't go any smaller than
non-existent."
"So, Debra can say goodbye to her titties," Zach once again giggled.
"And what little hair she has around her no longer private privates,"
his mother added to his giggling fit.
On that note, Santa was paged to the administrative wing.
"Sorry, I
have to go," he informed his delightful company.
"And we have to get these four naked ones to their pre-spanking display
and fondling time," Charles informed one and all.
The End