Stripped For Florida

Recent Court Rulings

* * * * *
This work is intended for ADULTS ONLY. It may contain depictions of sexual activity involving minors. If you are not of a legal age in your locality to view such material or if such material does not appeal to you, do not read further, and do not save this story.
* * * * *

Stripped For Florida

Recent Court Rulings

by Willie B. Florida
comments welcome to [email protected]

____________

Recent Court Cases Relevant to Florida’s SFF Program:

* * *

Court rejects nude "uniform"

A regulation imposed by the Hillsborough County School District (HCSD) that would have required all student athlete swimmers to compete in the nude was shot down by the Florida Supreme Court. The HCSD had argued that its new swim "uniform" was total nudity. It was unclear whether students would be allowed to be nude in public only for swim events, or if all swim team participants were effectively required to be stripped. The Court ruled that while those stripped under Florida's SFF program could wear "necessary and essential" safety equipment, including items otherwise banned under the program as "clothing" the reverse was not true. The ruling noted that "while private organizations can make nudity a requirement of employment, public school districts may not impose nudity nor participation in the SFF program a condition of participation." The regulation had been under a court-imposed stay and had never been put into effect.

* * *

Boy stripped, not emancipated

A 16-year old Pinellas County boy had his request to become an emancipated minor rejected in court yesterday morning. Judge Peter A. Robins, III, ruled that the only substantiated reason that the boy and his lawyer could offer for his request to be declared independent of his parents was their wish to have him stripped under the SFF program. Judge Robins ordered the boy stripped immediately after his ruling to the delight of all observers in the County Courthouse. In addition the teen was ordered to perform 25 hours of community service in lieu of his ability to pay court costs and to be put on the "shot" for three months--the time that his original stripping was delayed by his pursuit of emancipation. While the judge stated that none of these provisions were "punishment" for not abiding by his parents' wishes, judicial observers noted that this was the first known case of a court imposing such consequences for seeking legal reprieve from being stripped. The "shot" is widely accepted as producing much harder and long-lasting erections as compared to the pills administered to most stripped Florida boys.

* * *

Painted uniforms allowed

The "Golden Regiment" band of Buchholz High School in Gainesville, Florida, can continue its practice of body painting stripped students participating in its award winning band. Band director Mark Kazen and Buchholz H.S. principal Kevin Sharpe insisted that a uniformity of look was essential for the band's precision look and that without the body painting the band would be in danger of losing its decades long tradition of winning state and national awards. Each stripped student is painstakingly airbrushed to match the band's black and yellow uniforms prior to each game and marching event. Detail work is applied with fine-tipped brushes to simulate the buttons and trim of the uniforms. The makeup work takes hours before each event. To top it off, stripped students wear actual epaulets, gold braid, hats and plumes. "The paint is really uncomfortable," explained clarinet player Tina Song, "but it's worth it to be able to play in such a great musical group." The practice had been challenged by the SFF program which felt that the body painting was too extensive. "From the point of view of spectators in the stands or along a street, it is nearly impossible to tell that these students are actually stripped," explained SFF regional administrator Regina Kind. "However, we will not appeal the decision. Essentially the ruling declares that the body paint is a uniform, similar to football players being required to wear protective gear."

* * *

No “Orgasm Test”

A lower court ruled today that there was no so-called "Orgasm Test" to determine whether minors were being mistreated by parents or guardians. The case primarily involves girls who are often hooked up to vibrators set on "permanent orgasm" mode. The Coalition of Underaged Nude Teenagers (COUNT, or as it is often called, CUNT), Planned Parenthood, and the Stop Sexual Abuse Coalition brought the case on behalf of twelve girls who they say have been subjected to "near 24-hour orgasm cycles" which they say have made it impossible for the girls to concentrate in school, be involved in extracurricular activities, or live any semblance of a "normal life." The court ruled that no proof was offered that the parents were preventing their progeny from attending school, which would be illegal, and that they did not intend harm. Expert testimony from medical experts and sexologists was divided but inconclusive. "There is no physical limit to the number of orgasms a girl can experience in a 24-hour period of time," alleged Dr. Martin Silverman of the University of Naples Medical Center. "No physiological damage can be done by climaxing, even if experienced in serial mode," was the testimony of Alejandro Segova of Miami's Sexology Institute. Counter testimony included that of Dr. Mary Davies of the University of Tallahassee. "Female orgasm can induce physical symptoms, including abraded tissues, dryness, itching and even bleeding. However, the important point is that even in the absence of physiological symptoms, the psychological impact of these devices is intense. Furthermore, this is uncharted territory. Never in history have girls, some as young as six, seven or eight years old, been subjected to this regimen. We may find in future years that the incidence of mental illness, sexual dysfunction, relationship problems or even suicide is greatly increased among this population." Critics of the ruling complained that the male judge was insensitive to women's experiences of orgasm. Indeed, the judge remarked that "orgasm is a pleasurable sensation and I find no reason why parents are out of their rights to choose this experience for their daughters." The three groups indicated that they would appeal the ruling.

* * *

Split on trans rights

Transgender Floridians saw a slight increase in their legal rights in the recent Florida Supreme Court ruling. Otherwise, the official ban on changing one’s birth sex remains in place. The case involved a teen born as a female who argued that it created undue psychological harm to be stripped due to the dissonance between people’s perception of the female body he was forced to maintain despite transitioning to the male gender. Florida law forbids doctors from performing any type of surgery that would significantly alter sex-based physical traits. The teen argued that clothing allowed him to maintain an outward gender appearance in keeping with his male gender identification. He sought either the right to pursue medical treatment or an indefinite stay on being stripped. To complicate matters, the plaintiff is in the State of Florida’s foster care system and it was a social worker who put the teen into the SFF program. It was the position of the Department of Children and Families (DCF) that wards of the foster care system exhibiting “gender dysphoria” be stripped in order to “re-orient psychosexual social identification” to the original birth state. The Florida Supreme Court sought the expert testimony of neurologists, endocrinologists, psychologists and surgeons as well as academics specializing in sexual and gender identity. The court ruled that DCF had no blanket authority to strip minors as a “treatment” but that this should be decided by doctors and social workers on a case-by-case basis. The justices split current law into two parts: henceforth transgender individuals may obtain prescriptions for transgender hormone therapy, a matter which heretofore had been legally ambiguous. However, the court upheld the current ban on surgery. In the court’s press briefing it was announced that “it is our suggestion that the legislative branch revisit the constraints currently in the laws” regulating the state’s SFF program. This has been widely interpreted as referring specifically to the ban on certain transgender-related surgeries. As for the plaintiff, the DCF social worker announced that his case was being reviewed in light of the new ruling and that pending any court stay he could be stripped as early as next week.

* * *

A day at the beach, a life in the nude

What started as sandy bathing suits has left two siblings stripped for life. When Jasmine and Jeremy were strapped into their car seats for a trip to Daytona Beach Shores they expected sun, surf, fun and perhaps a sleepy ride home. But things took a slightly different turn when the toddlers decided to pull off their suits. “It’s a totally normal thing for kids to do,” their mother explained. “The suits got sandy, and we all know that’s uncomfortable.” Daytona Beach Shores Beach Patrol scanned the kids running naked on the sand and informed the parents that they were required to strip the brother and sister. “That’s the law,” Maurice Friedrich, Superintendent of the Beach Patrol explained. “Parents or guardians are given a choice of a fine or stripping the child or children in question.” The bigger accident occurred when the attendant at the nearest SFF booth stripped both kids for life. “It’s a different type of chip—and it is permanently placed under the skin,” SFF regional coordinator Max Blue insisted. The parents took the case to court. “I didn’t mind my kids being stripped,” their mother insisted. “In a way it is easier, but I never intended that they’d never wear clothes again!” Jasmine and Jeremy join the growing number of Floridians who will be naked forever. The judge ruled that the substantial fee for being stripped for life be waived. “The plaintiffs received a substantial monetary benefit as a result of this incident,” Judge Connor opined. “If the parents had chosen this course for their children voluntarily the cost would have been in the thousands of dollars.”

(End of File)